 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1910 - 858 str.
...State, to haul or permit to be hauled or used on its line within this State any car used in moving traffic not equipped with couplers coupling automatically...necessity of men going between the ends of the cars : Provided, that nothing in this act contained shall apply to trains composed of four wheeled cars... | |
 | New York (State). Board of Railroad Commissioners - 1895 - 682 str.
...that purpose. § 2. That on and after the first day of January, eighteen hundred and ninety-eight, it shall be unlawful for any such common carrier to...necessity of men going between the ends of the cars. § 3. That when any person, firm, company, or corporation engaged in interstate commerce by railroad... | |
 | New York (State). Board of Railroad Commissioners - 1907 - 796 str.
...first day of January, Automatic i ighteen hundred and ninety -eight, it shall be unlawful rouplcrafor any such common carrier to haul or permit to be hauled...necessity of men going between the ends of the cars. SEC. 3. That when any person, firm, company, or corpo- Wh(,n carriPl.s ration engaged in interstate... | |
 | Massachusetts - 1894 - 950 str.
...that purpose. SECT. 2. That on and after the first day of January, eighteen hundred and ninety-eight, it shall be unlawful for any such common carrier to...necessity of men going between the ends of the cars. SECT. 3. That when any person, firm, company or corporation engaged in interstate commerce by railroad... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1921 - 688 str.
...toward the center with his foot. The provision of the second section of the Safety Appliance act is : "It shall be unlawful for any such common carrier...necessity of men going between the ends of the cars." It was proved on the trial by defendant in error that there was in general use on railroad cars in... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1914 - 718 str.
...Appliance acts do not require any particular automatic coupler. Any standard coupler which will couple automatically by impact, and which can be uncoupled without the necessity of men going between the cars, will satisfy the requirements of the Federal and State Safety Appliance acts. 9. SAME — violation... | |
 | 1911 - 1122 str.
...railway companies must equip each car used in moving inter-State traffic with couplers which couple automatically by impact and which can be uncoupled...necessity of men going between the ends of the cars. The lower court held that the statute did not impose upon the carrier an absolute duty to keep its... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1910 - 648 str.
...provides as follows : "That on and after the first day of January, eighteen hundred and ninety-eight, it shall be unlawful for any such common carrier to...necessity of men going between the ends of the cars." And by the amendment of March 2, 1903, it was further provided that the provisions and regulations... | |
| |
January, eighteen hundred and ninetyeight, it shall be unlawful for any such common carrier to haul or permit to be hauled or used on its line any car used in moving interstate traffic not equipped with couplers coupling automatically by impact, and which... 
