 It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom the like special franchises had been...  Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - Strana 239autor/autoři: Michigan. Supreme Court, George C. Gibbs, Randolph Manning, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, Hoyt Post, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, John Adams Brooks, Henry Allen Chaney, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper, William Dudley Fuller, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell - 1874Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | Joseph Kinnicut Angell, Samuel Ames - 1846 - 872 str.
...purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body, in its public and numicipal character; but if for purposes of private advantage and emolument, though...quoad hoc, is to be regarded as a private company. 1 A hospital founded by a private benefaction, is, in point of law, a private corporation, though dedicated... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1909 - 790 str.
...public purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body in its public political or municipal character; but if the grant was for purposes of private...whom the like special franchises had been conferred." Although it was said in Davidson v. Hine, that " a municipal fire department is indistinguishable from... | |
 | Murray Hoffman - 1853 - 456 str.
...advantage or emolument, although the public may derive a common benefit therefrom, the Corporation, so far, is to be regarded as a private company. It stands...whom the like special franchises had been conferred. It is upon the like distinction that municipal corporations, in their private character as owners and... | |
 | Louisiana. Supreme Court - 1855 - 710 str.
...the corporate body in its public or municipal character. But if for purposes of private advantage, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom,...quoad hoc, is to be regarded as a private company." In the case of Martin v. Mayor of Brooklyn, 1 Hill, 550, the court say : " It is impossible to maintain... | |
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour - 1858 - 714 str.
...the defendants quoad hoc were to be regarded as a private company." He says : i: It [the corporation] stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom the like special franchise had been conferred," and cites a large number of authorities on the point. This decision... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1920 - 684 str.
...its public, polftical or municipal character; but if the grant was for purposes of private advantages and emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation quo ad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands upon the same footing as would any individual... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1907 - 750 str.
...its capacity of a private corporation and not in the exercise of its police powers. It stands upon the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom like special franchises had been conferred. ll'\1gner v. Rock Island, 146 111. 154. Where an injury... | |
 | Murray Hoffman - 1862 - 474 str.
...the corporate body, in its public, political, or municipal character. But if the grant was for the purposes of private advantage and emolument, though...whom the like special franchises had been conferred. The title of the property taken by the Water Commissioners was vested, by the 14th section of the act,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1867 - 732 str.
...respect to the powers conferred by these laws, is to be regarded as a private corporation, standing on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom like privileges had been conferred. Or, in the language of the court in Bailey v. The JUayor, £e.,... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1868 - 776 str.
...public purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body in its public, political, or municipal character. But if the grant was for purposes of private...derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation quo ad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual... | |
| |
