Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart EnglandLongman, 2003 - Počet stran: 266 This volume presents a sociolinguistic perspective on the history of the English language. Based on original empirical research, it discusses the social factors that promoted linguistic changes in earlier English, and the people who were the leading force behind them. The authors focus on the major grammatical developments that shaped the language in Tudor and Stuart times, the period that laid the foundations for modern Standard English. Nevalainen and Raumolin-Brunberg adopt an interdisciplinary approach, exploring the extent to which sociolinguistic models and methods can be applied to the history of English. |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-3 z 7
Strana 126
... attempt to extend the systematic use of DO to affirmative statements . It is supported by the simultaneous rise in the use of Do in negative statements , another process clearly led by women , to be discussed below . Why Do became ...
... attempt to extend the systematic use of DO to affirmative statements . It is supported by the simultaneous rise in the use of Do in negative statements , another process clearly led by women , to be discussed below . Why Do became ...
Strana 145
... attempt to diffuse among all echelons of Englishmen , -s lived on as a common suffix among the lower orders until it gained new popularity after 1620 . Since the 40 - year temporal frame , despite offering a good overview , seems ...
... attempt to diffuse among all echelons of Englishmen , -s lived on as a common suffix among the lower orders until it gained new popularity after 1620 . Since the 40 - year temporal frame , despite offering a good overview , seems ...
Strana 150
... attempt of third - person -s probably failed because it did not spread into the upper strata , but , when it finally did so around 1600 , the road was open for rapid diffusion . Multiple negation was first dropped among the upper ranks ...
... attempt of third - person -s probably failed because it did not spread into the upper strata , but , when it finally did so around 1600 , the road was open for rapid diffusion . Multiple negation was first dropped among the upper ranks ...
Obsah
Sociolinguistic Paradigms and Language Change | 16 |
Background and Informants | 26 |
Real Time | 53 |
Autorská práva | |
Další části 12 nejsou zobrazeny.
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
1998 and Supplement adverbs affirmative statements apparent-time Camden CEEC Cely cent Chancery Standard Chapter Correspondence Court dialect dialectology diffusion discussed Dorothy Osborne Early Modern English early modern period East Anglia English Studies factor group factors favour fifteenth Figure frequency Gender distribution genres gentry gerund grammar guistic historical linguistics historical sociolinguistics included Indefinite pronouns John Labov language change Late Middle letters linguistic changes linguistic variation London mid-range Middle English middle ranks Milroy multiple negation Nevalainen & Raumolin-Brunberg North northern Nurmi Paston pattern Percentage periphrastic possessive determiner prepositional present-day prop-word Record Society relative adverbs relative pronoun Rissanen role S-curve Sabine Johnson seventeenth century single negation sixteenth century social aspirers social class social embedding social status sociolects speakers speech communities Standard English Stuart England subperiod suggests supralocal Table third-person singular suffix Trudgill Tudor and Stuart upper ranks usage variable women words writing