Appendix; the technical papers of the first report of the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug AbuseU.S. Government Printing Office, 1972 |
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
14th Amendment adults alcohol amount of marihuana amphetamines arrestees Attorney barbiturates behavior blue collar BNDD C-2 Pro SS cannabis charged Commission convicted Cook County courts crime criminal law data in Table decriminalization defendants Demographic Characteristics deter disposition districts Drug Abuse effects experience with marihuana Face Sheet federal filed grams guilty heroin household housing unit huana incarceration included interview investigation involved jurisdictions juveniles kilograms less liquor mari marihuana arrests marihuana laws Marihuana or Hashish marihuana users ment Methamphetamines Narcotics nondrug officers opinion ounces penalties percent persons phase police population possession of marihuana Prior Arrest prior drug arrests probation problem prosecution prosecutors questions Race White regulation respondent sale of marihuana sample search warrants seized seizure selected sentence social South Dakota Specify SS B X status survey teachers tion Total Unknown warrant Yes Yes young youth
Oblíbené pasáže
Strana 1129 - Accordingly, whatever occasion would restrain orderly discussion and persuasion, at appropriate time and place, must have clear support in public danger, actual or impending. Only the gravest abuses, endangering paramount interests, give occasion for permissible limitation.
Strana 1122 - The makers of our Constitution undertook to secure conditions favorable to the pursuit of happiness. They recognized the significance of man's spiritual nature, of his feelings and of his intellect. They knew that only a part of the pain, pleasure, and satisfaction of life are to be found in material things. They sought to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their sensations. They conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone...
Strana 1129 - ... shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within Its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," undoubtedly intended, not only that there should be no arbitrary deprivation of life or liberty, or arbitrary spoliation of property, but that equal protection and security should be given to all under like circumstances in the enjoyment of their personal and civil rights...
Strana 1130 - must be reasonable, not arbitrary, and must rest upon some ground of difference having a fair and substantial relation to the object of the legislation, so that all persons similarly circumstanced shall be treated alike.
Strana 1130 - That must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis.
Strana 1123 - The present case, then, concerns a relationship lying within the zone of privacy created by several fundamental constitutional guarantees. And it concerns a law which, in forbidding the use of contraceptives rather than regulating their manufacture or sale, seeks to achieve its goals by means having a maximum destructive impact upon that relationship.
Strana 1130 - ... regulatory legislation affecting ordinary commercial transactions is not to be pronounced unconstitutional unless in the light of the facts made known or generally assumed it is of such a character as to preclude the assumption that it rests upon some rational basis within the knowledge and experience of the legislators.* See Metropolitan Casualty Ins.
Strana 1123 - We deal with a right of privacy older than the Bill of Rights— older than our political parties, older than our school system.
Strana 1246 - John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York, New York RITAMARY BRADLEY, Professor Emerita, Department of English, St.
Strana 1130 - All who are included in the class are tainted with the mischief, but there are others also tainted whom the classification does not include. Since the classification does not include all who are similarly situated with respect to the purpose of the law, there is a prima facie violation of the equal protection requirement of reasonable classification.