Order affirmed and judgment absolute in favor of defendant, without costs: 134 N. Y. 313. 63 32 LAMMING V. GALUSHA..... Judgment of General Term reversed and that of Special Term affirmed, with leave to defendants to withdraw demurrer and plead over: 135 N. Y. 239. MARK V. HYATT.. ..... Judgment affirmed: 135 N. Y. 306. MATTER OF CORWIN . Order of General Term reversed and order of Special Term affirmed: 135 N. Y. 245. Order affirmed, with costs to the respondent to be paid out of the residuary estate: 135 N. Y. 292. MCDOUGALL v. PROVIDENT SAVINGS SOCIETY... 64 515 Order of General Term, and judgment entered thereon, reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event: 135 N. Y. 551. MCFADDEN v. ALLEN 50 361 Judgment affirmed: 134 N. Y. 489. MILLER v. NEW JERSEY STEAMBOAT Co...... Order affirmed on opinion of General Term, and judgment absolute in favor of defendant on stipulation: 135 N. Y. 612. MITCHELL V. THORNE.. 57 405 Judgment affirmed, with costs, and the defendant have leave to withdraw her demurrer and answer upon payment of costs within twenty days: 134 N. Y. 536. Ordered as directed in opinion of PECKHAM, J.: 135 N. Y. 473. PEOPLE EX REL. LOWER v. DONOVAN.... Orders reversed: 135 N. Y. 76. PEOPLE EX REL. POND v. SUPERVISORS OF MONROE COUNTY ......... 65 263 PREUSTER . SUPREME COUNCIL OF THE ORDER OF CHOSEN FRIENDS, 60 324 Judgment affirmed: 135 N. Y. 417. QUILTY V. BATTIE..... 61 164 Judgment affirmed as to the defendant Rebecca B. Battie, with costs, and reversed as to the defendant Joseph M. Battie, and the complaint dismissed as to him, with costs in all courts: 135 N. Y. 201. SCHUYLER V. PHOENIX INSURANCE Co...... SEXTON V. BREESE.... Order affirmed and judgment directed on the verdict, with costs : 135 N. Y. 387. THIRD NAT. BANK v. HASTINGS.. Judgment affirmed: 134 N. Y. 501. VANDEWATER v. N. Y. AND N. E. R. R. Co...... 56 493 Judgment affirmed: 134 N. Y. 345. The attention of the profession is called to the fact that the Court of Appeals in many cases decide an appeal upon other grounds than those stated in the opinion of the court below.. The affirmance or reversal of the judgment of the General Term does not necessarily show that the Court of Appeals concurred in, or dissented from, the statements contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court.- [REP. PAGE. Barton, Syracuse Sav. Bk. v. 630 Bradley, Penn Mut. Life Ins. Battaglia, People v. Bauder, Sisson v. Beard v. Tilghman 583 Brandon, Healy v. 631 Brayton, Ehlein v. Bayne, Pittsfield Nat. Bank v. 633 Brennan v. Brennan 12 Brooklyn Elevated R. R. Co., 634 631 Brower v. Husted 75 Brown v. Doscher 632 Brown, Nelson v. 631 Brown v. Tilden. 57 Bruggerhof, Foote v. 629 Bryant, Shaw v. PAGE. 635 632 384 Bucholz v. N. Y., L. E. and 626 Benton, People ex rel., v. Court of Sessions Berrott, Cook v.. Best, Sayles v. Betsinger, People v. Binghamton Trust Co., Peo 630 Bulkley, Matter of, v. Super- 631 Bullard v. Harris 233, 628, 629 Bullard v. Kenyon 635 Burke v. N. Y. C. and H. R. R. R. Co. 377 628 635 . 628 628, 629 . 628 635 Bullock, Riendeau v. . 628 630 604 Burnham v.Cape Vincent Seed 633 Bowery Savings Bank v. Belt, 57 Campbell, People ex rel. Davis C. 626 Callahan, Matter of . 557 Callanan, Wilsey v. . 118 . 629 531 42 Campbell, Gibbons v. . 631 Blake, Hanover Nat. Bank v. 33 Bush, People ex rel., v. County |