 | 1849 - 620 str.
...Madison's report of the proceedings of that body that one object of the reservation was, that the slates should not be restrained from laying duties of tonnage for the purpose of clearing harbours. Other objects were named in the debates, and among them the support of seamen. Mr. Madison,... | |
 | John Stilwell Jenkins - 1850 - 412 str.
...subject was fully considered by the convention that framed the constitution. It appears, in Mr. Madison,s report of the proceedings of that body, that one object...the reservation was, that the States should not be restricted from laying duties of tonnage for the' purpose of clearing harbors. Other objects were named... | |
 | John Stilwell Jenkins - 1851 - 410 str.
...that framed the constitution. It appears in Mr. Madison,s report of the proceedings of that body, thnt one object of the reservation was, that the States should not be restricted from laying duties of tonnage for the purpose of clearing harbors. Other objects were named... | |
 | United States. President - 1853 - 536 str.
...organization of the present government. The constitution provides that " no stato shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any duty of tonnage." With the "...Other objects were named in the debates, and among tliem the support of seamen. Mr. Madison, treating on this subject in the Federalist, declares that... | |
 | George Ticknor Curtis - 1863 - 700 str.
...of the Chesapeake Bay, illustrates the object of this provision. They desired that the States might not be restrained from laying duties of tonnage "for the purpose of clearing harbors and erecting light-houses." It was perhaps capable of being contended, that, as the regulation of commerce... | |
 | Jonathan Elliot - 1863 - 680 str.
...delay until Congress can be consulted," — Mr. M'HENRY and Mr. CARROLL moved, that " No state shall be restrained from laying duties of tonnage for the purpose of clearing harbors and erecting light-houses." Col. MASON, in support of this, explained and urged the situation of the... | |
 | George Ticknor Curtis - 1889 - 800 str.
...of the Chesapeake Bay, illustrates the object of this provision. They desired that the states might not be restrained from laying duties of tonnage " for the purpose of clearing harbors and erecting light-houses." It was perhaps capable of being contended, that, as the regulation of commerce... | |
 | Kate Mason Rowland - 1892 - 550 str.
...substitute except Virginia.' Messrs. McHenry and Carroll, of Maryland, moved that " no State shall be restrained from laying duties of tonnage for the purpose of clearing harbours and erecting light-houses." Colonel Mason, in support of this motion, " explained and urged... | |
 | United States. Constitutional Convention - 1893 - 432 str.
...delay until Congress can be consulted," — Mr. McHENRY and Mr. CARROLL moved, that " no State shall be restrained from laying duties of tonnage for the purpose of clearing harbours and erecting light-houses." Col. MASON, in support of this, explained and urged the situation... | |
 | Erastus Howard Scott - 1893
...delay until Congress can be consulted," — Mr. McIlENRY. and Mr. CABBOLL moved, that " no State shall be restrained from laying duties of tonnage for the purpose of clearing harbours and erecting light-houses." CoL MASON, in support of this, explained and urged the situation... | |
| |
no State shall be restrained from laying duties of tonnage for the purpose of clearing harbours and erecting lighthouses. 
