 | 1869 - 1032 str.
...in the ordinary course of things, does not happen to those who have the management of machinery and use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care." But that case also differs from die present... | |
 | Great Britain. Privy Council. Judicial Committee, Edmund F. Moore - 1864 - 596 str.
...Defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care,...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the Defendants, that the accident arose from want of care," which rule, we submit, is applicable to the... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1905 - 922 str.
...things, does not happen if those who have the management use the proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." The limitations governing the application of the rule are thus stated by Wigmore. (Sec.... | |
 | 1881 - 572 str.
...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such us in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care, " — was applied to a bale of goods slung from... | |
 | 1881 - 572 str.
...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such из iu the ordinary course of things does not bap)>eii if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, iu the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care, " — was... | |
 | 1871 - 874 str.
...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." So in Ourtis v. The Rochester and Syracuse Railroad Company, 18 NY 543, the Court of... | |
 | Victoria. Supreme Court - 1871 - 380 str.
...under the management of the defendant, the accident is such aa in the ordinary course does not happen if ^those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care. Seoll v. London Dock Company,... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, Hiram Edward Sickels - 1872 - 788 str.
...Rock, and Syr. RR Co., 18 NY, 543.) So, in the Exchequer Chamber, it was held, that where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant,...management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence that the accident arose from want of care. (Scott v. Lond. Dock Co., 3 Hurlst. & Colt., 596.) It is... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1906 - 660 str.
...injured any one, is enough to make out a presumption of negligence. When a thing which causes the injury is shown to be under the management of the defendant,...explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." The following cases selected at random from a much longer list, will serve to illustrate... | |
| |
J., observed that in order for it to apply "there must be reasonable evidence of negligence, but where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not... 
