...secured by a mortgage on lands. When the defendant discovered this he applied for, and was allowed, a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and set aside, because the notice required to be filed, by an act entitled "Supplement to an act entitled...

...that judgment was taken against him by default ; that other counsel, on January 13th, 1888, obtained a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened ; that this rule was abandoned, and he then employed his present counsel, and that the sheriff of Camden...

...the plaintiffs in the suit and the attorney for the defendants therein. The answer also alleges that a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened was taken in behalf of the defendants in that suit, or some of them, and was discharged because it...

...record, that on the 18th of January, 1832, on motion of Mr. Bell, and affidavit filed, the court granted a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened, and the defendant let into a defence ; upon this rule proceedings similar to those in the first mentioned...

...could have got nothing if the sheriff had done his duty, can demand nothing for the breach of it.9 And a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened docs not stay the proceedings without an order of the court to that effect ; ami the sheriff is liable...

...by default, on the 15th of April, 1838 ; and, on the 22d of the same month, the defendant obtained a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened, which was returnable on the 27th, and was then, at the request of the plaintiff adjourned over until...

...the petitioner of her dower in the lands of her husband, should she survive him. The prayer is for a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened or set aside and she be permitted to make defence to the same; to1 stay the fi.fa. and grant her such...

...the plaintiffs in the suit and the attorney for the defendants therein. The answer also alleges that a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened was taken in behalf of the defendants in that suit, or some of them, and was discharged because it...

...executed the warrant placed in his hands as against Shaub. In March, 1918, Shaub presented a petition for a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened as to him, and a rule was granted. This rule was discharged in an opinion filed on July 6th, 1918 [36...

...to enforce it. Besides, in this case, it appears by the bill itself that, upon the application for a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened, the chief justice refused to entertain the motion. This is very strong proof that the judge who heard...