Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, Svazek 140Department of Purchase and Supply, 1925 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 98
Strana 38
... Held : That as the demurrer admitted the truth of the allegation of the bill that the complainant was in possession of the land and had title thereto , complainant did not have an adequate remedy at law , as the law does not permit an ...
... Held : That as the demurrer admitted the truth of the allegation of the bill that the complainant was in possession of the land and had title thereto , complainant did not have an adequate remedy at law , as the law does not permit an ...
Strana 39
... Held : That the act was not retrospective , as there was nothing in it signifying that it was the intention of the legislature that it should relate to suits or actions instituted before its passage . 15. EQUITY - Laches - When Doctrine ...
... Held : That the act was not retrospective , as there was nothing in it signifying that it was the intention of the legislature that it should relate to suits or actions instituted before its passage . 15. EQUITY - Laches - When Doctrine ...
Strana 89
... Held : That if the motion to strike out had been sustained , it could have been of no advantage to defendant . 2. EQUITY - Cross Bill - Answer to Cross Bill - Motion to Strike Out - Claim Arising Pending Litigation - Case at Bar . - In ...
... Held : That if the motion to strike out had been sustained , it could have been of no advantage to defendant . 2. EQUITY - Cross Bill - Answer to Cross Bill - Motion to Strike Out - Claim Arising Pending Litigation - Case at Bar . - In ...
Strana 90
... Held : That the refusal to pass on the motion to strike out the portions . of the answer referred to did not adjudicate any principles in the case , nor establish any rules of evidence that would in any way affect the right of the ...
... Held : That the refusal to pass on the motion to strike out the portions . of the answer referred to did not adjudicate any principles in the case , nor establish any rules of evidence that would in any way affect the right of the ...
Strana 100
Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals. Opinion . reply if the answer was held sufficient , and the defend- ant without opportunity to amend if his answer was held insufficient , and the case without evidence on the matter in controversy ...
Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals. Opinion . reply if the answer was held sufficient , and the defend- ant without opportunity to amend if his answer was held insufficient , and the case without evidence on the matter in controversy ...
Obsah
| 395 | |
| 396 | |
| 399 | |
| 401 | |
| 408 | |
| 417 | |
| 418 | |
| 428 | |
| 50 | |
| 56 | |
| 58 | |
| 62 | |
| 64 | |
| 70 | |
| 71 | |
| 76 | |
| 77 | |
| 80 | |
| 84 | |
| 86 | |
| 89 | |
| 92 | |
| 101 | |
| 104 | |
| 105 | |
| 106 | |
| 122 | |
| 123 | |
| 132 | |
| 134 | |
| 156 | |
| 157 | |
| 164 | |
| 173 | |
| 176 | |
| 183 | |
| 185 | |
| 187 | |
| 192 | |
| 193 | |
| 203 | |
| 213 | |
| 217 | |
| 224 | |
| 227 | |
| 233 | |
| 234 | |
| 236 | |
| 240 | |
| 248 | |
| 253 | |
| 258 | |
| 260 | |
| 280 | |
| 305 | |
| 312 | |
| 325 | |
| 327 | |
| 333 | |
| 337 | |
| 339 | |
| 347 | |
| 348 | |
| 349 | |
| 351 | |
| 369 | |
| 371 | |
| 380 | |
| 432 | |
| 434 | |
| 437 | |
| 439 | |
| 441 | |
| 447 | |
| 453 | |
| 471 | |
| 475 | |
| 479 | |
| 485 | |
| 489 | |
| 491 | |
| 495 | |
| 505 | |
| 513 | |
| 517 | |
| 520 | |
| 553 | |
| 564 | |
| 570 | |
| 577 | |
| 581 | |
| 582 | |
| 584 | |
| 586 | |
| 594 | |
| 600 | |
| 609 | |
| 618 | |
| 625 | |
| 627 | |
| 631 | |
| 637 | |
| 638 | |
| 649 | |
| 660 | |
| 664 | |
| 667 | |
| 668 | |
| 676 | |
| 685 | |
| 689 | |
| 704 | |
| 721 | |
| 724 | |
| 732 | |
| 734 | |
| 735 | |
| 736 | |
| 740 | |
| 742 | |
| 745 | |
| 758 | |
| 777 | |
| 779 | |
| 790 | |
| 811 | |
| 820 | |
| 870 | |
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
accused action Affirmed aforesaid alleged amendment appellee application assignment of error attorney Bar.-In the instant Brewster county cause certificate charged Circuit Court city of Roanoke claim coal company Code Commission Commonwealth complainant construction contract corporation cost court of equity damages decree deed defendant's delivered the opinion demurrer duty entered evidence fact February 28 fee simple filed follows Ford Motor Company garnishee guilty held indictment injury instructs the jury issue judge judgment land liability Massie ment motion negligence Norfolk offense operating ordinary live stock owner parties person plaintiff in error pleadings proceedings prosecution purchase question reasonable reference refused remanded road rule school board September 18 South Norfolk statement statute street suit Supreme Court Syllabus testified testimony thereof tion tract trial by jury trial court valuation verdict Virginia warrant water rights Weldon Edwards witnesses