The Eminent Domain Revolt: Changing Perceptions in a New Constitutional EpochAlgora Publishing, 2007 - Počet stran: 269 What's behind the anger against eminent domain? It's a movement sweeping your state and the entire country. Here's the first in-depth analysis of the profound legal issues, and proposed changes which go far beyond seizing property and land use regulation. Ryskamp provides an up-to-the-minute report on the law and politics of eminent domain after the Supreme Court's (in)famous Kelo v. New London decision of June of 2005. All the states are just beginning to debate reforming their eminent domain laws, and there is nothing whatsoever on the market which would give them a clue as to how to frame the debate. Legislators are bewildered as to how to proceed, The eminent domain issue involves a new legal controversy about an apparently settled issue. It demands knowledge of the history out of which the Constitution arose, as well as legal background. In the famous Lindsey v. Normet Supreme Court case, 405 US 56 (1972), the Court found there was no right to housing, which is one of the reasons we are in the midst of this eminent domain controversy now. However, the Court made it clear that it was simply the argument which was not convincing, not that such a right could not be found. This book presents, among other things, a new housing right argument which has not previously been used. However, the dominant theme of the book is precisely the unsettled nature of the law and facts of this controversy. Readers need to inform themselves and think for themselves. In an area in which public opinion will determine much of the outcome, there are no experts -and public opinion is just beginning to form. What everyone needs is information, and a clear presentation of arguments to use when testing theirown views. Legal scholars may disagree about Ryskamp's location of the right to housing (under Fifth Amendment Due Process), but the book will convince many readers that we have to start working to understand the legal principles involved in this controversy. John Ryskamp earned his JD at Golden Gate University in 1985. |
Obsah
1 | |
9 | |
11 | |
Chapter 2 Kelo and Its Discontents | 65 |
Chapter 3 The New Bill of Rights as Law | 123 |
Chapter 4 The New Bill of Rights as Fact | 167 |
Chapter 5 The Early Days of the New Bill of Rights | 201 |
Conclusion | 251 |
Bibliography | 261 |
Index | 265 |
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
analysis archived articulate attorney Bensenville Bill of Rights blight city’s condemnation Constitutional epoch context corridors County direct scrutiny doctrine Due Process economic development eminent domain eminent domain action eminent domain powers eminent domain reform enforcement entity equal protection Federal Fifth Amendment Fort Trumbull Fourth Amendment government purpose government’s hoc facts homeowners homes http://ssrn indicia indicium individual Institute for Justice intermediate scrutiny involuntary deprivation issue judiciary Kelo decision land Lawrence legislation legislature level of scrutiny liberty litigation London Madison maintenance Marbury ment minimum scrutiny municipal neighborhood nent domain NLDC Novus O’Hare officials Pfizer plaintiffs political system private development private property property owners property rights proposed public opinion question redevelopment Riviera Beach scrutiny continuum scrutiny for housing scrutiny regime simply state’s strict scrutiny Supreme Court there’s tion Trans-Texas Corridor vindicate violation West Coast Hotel zoning