Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation AnalysisF.H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser Springer Science & Business Media, 14. 3. 2013 - Počet stran: 167 In 1999 we invited a small number of colleagues to take part in a colloquium - voted to the analysis of argumentative discourse from two kinds of perspective: a dialectical and a rhetorical perspective. Our intention was to start a thorough disc- sion on the commonalities and differences between the two approaches. In this way we hoped to promote the development of analytic tools for dealing with argum- tation in which, in some way or other, the merits of both approaches are combined. The colloquium took place at the University of Amsterdam. In 2000 it was followed by a second colloquium at New York University, and in 2001 by a third one at Northwestern University. We are grateful to all three universities for giving us the chance to organize three exciting and fruitful meetings and we thank Eugene Garver, Eveline T. Feteris, M.A. van Rees, Ralph Johnson, A. Francisca Snoeck Hen- mans, Jose Plug, Bart Garssen, and Leah Polcar, who took part in the discussions but are not represented in this volume, for their critical and useful contributions. |
Obsah
And Always the Twain Shall Meet | |
THE RHETORIC TO ALEXANDER ON THE ENTHYMEME | |
TYPES AND GOALS OF RHETORIC | |
Rhetoric and Dialectic | |
REFERENCES | |
REFERENCES | |
REFERENCES | |
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis F.H. van Eemeren,Peter Houtlosser Náhled není k dispozici. - 2002 |
Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis F.H. van Eemeren,Peter Houtlosser Náhled není k dispozici. - 2010 |
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
abortion accused Alcidamas Amsterdam analysis answer AntiFederalist approach arguers argumentation theory argumentative discourse Aristotle Aristotle’s audience Blackmun Boethius burden Cicero claim classical conception Conference on Argumentation consideration Constitution context controversy Court critical discussion debate decision definition deliberative argumentation dialectic and rhetoric dialogue dispute Eemeren endoxa enthymeme fact fallacious Federalist Federalist Papers fetus forensic Govier Hohmann Houtlosser human illocutionary acts inthe Isocrates issues Johnson Kauffeld Krabbe legal argumentation logic matter National Communication Association Nigeria normative O’Connor objections ofthe one’s onthe opinion opponents parties person personhood perspective persuasive argumentation Planned Parenthood position potential practice pragmadialectical pragmatic probative obligations probative responsibilities proposed propositions Protagoras question Quintilian rational rhetoric and dialectic Rhetoric to Alexander Rhetorica rhetorical art rhetorical tradition rhetoricians Schiappa Shell Sic Sat Socrates speaker speech acts stage standpoint stasis strategic maneuvering Study of Argumentation thatthe theoretical theory tobe Topica topics tothe University Press