 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1963 - 468 str.
...layman has small and sometimes no skill in the science of law. If charged with crime, he is incapable, generally, of determining for himself whether the...put on trial without a proper charge, and convicted vipon incompetent evidence, or evidence irrelevant to the issue or otherwise inadmissable. He lacks... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1968 - 688 str.
...that an individual who is forced to defend himself stands a greater risk of improper conviction:87 Left without the aid of counsel he may be put on trial...issue or otherwise inadmissible. He lacks both the tk.ll and knowledge adequately to prepare his defense, even though he have a perfect one. He requires... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1970 - 574 str.
...layman has small and sometimes no skill in the science of law. If charged with crime, he is incapable, generally, of determining for himself whether the...irrelevant to the issue or otherwise inadmissible. Powell v. Alabama, 287 US 45, 69 (1932). Substantial differences have been found in the outcomes of... | |
 | United States Commission on Civil Rights - 1970 - 164 str.
...layman has small and sometimes no skill in the science of law. If charged with a crime, he is incapable, generally, of determining for himself whether the...and convicted upon incompetent evidence, or evidence lrrelevant to the issue or otherwise inadmissible. He lacks both the skill and knowledge to adequately... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1971 - 1910 str.
...layman has small and sometimes no skill in the science of law. If charged with crime, he is incapable, generally, of determining for himself whether the...irrelevant to the issue or otherwise inadmissible. 81.1 Providing Defense Services constitutional considerations both of fair procedure and equal treatment... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1974 - 400 str.
...layman has small and sometimes no skill in the science of law. If charged with a crime, he is incapable, generally, of determining for himself whether the...and convicted upon incompetent evidence, or evidence irrevelant to the issue or otherwise inadmissible. He lacks both the skill and knowledge adequately... | |
| |
Even the intelligent and educated layman has small and sometimes no skill in the science of law. If charged with crime, he is incapable, generally, of determining for himself whether the indictment is good or bad. He is unfamiliar with the rules of evidence.... 
