 | Canada. Parliament. Senate - 1903 - 608 str.
...if, in the opinion of the judge who tries the action, such cattle get at large without any negligent or wilful act or omission of the owner or his agent, or of the custodian of such cattle, or his agent, and got upon the railway by reason of fences, gates and cattle-guards not being... | |
 | 1906 - 790 str.
...elsewhere? A. On the railway 50 or 60 rods from the crossing. Q. 4. Did the plaintiff's horses get at large through the negligence, or wilful act or omission of the plaintiff? A. No. Q. 5. If the plaintiff's horses did get at large through the negligence or wilful... | |
 | 1904 - 928 str.
...jurisdiction, unless the company, in the opinion of the court or jury trying the case, establishes that such animal got at large through the negligence...wilful act or omission of the owner or his agent, or the custodian of such animal or his agent ; but the fact that such animal was not in charge of such... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interstate Commerce - 1905 - 1170 str.
...jurisdiction, unless the company, in the opinion of the court or jury trying the case, establishes that such animal got at large through the negligence...agent, or of the custodian of such animal or his agent; but the fact that such animal was not in charge of some competent person or persons shall not for the... | |
 | Canada - 1906 - 924 str.
...Burden of in any action in any court of competent jurisdiction, unless the proofcompany establishes that such animal got at large through the negligence...agent, or of the custodian of such animal or his agent. 5. The fact that any such animal was not in charge of some Eight to competent person or persons shall... | |
 | 1906 - 1348 str.
...jurisdiction, unless the company, in the opinion of the court or jury trying the case, establishes that such animal got at large through the negligence...agent, or of the custodian of such animal or his agent; but the fact that such animal was not in charge of some competent person or persons shall not for the... | |
 | Ontario - 1906 - 1142 str.
...jurisdiction, unless the company, ia the opinion of the court or jury trying the case, establishes that such animal got at large through the negligence...agent, or of the custodian of such animal or his agent; but the fact that such animal was not in charge of some competent person or persons shall not, for... | |
 | 1906 - 784 str.
...jurisdiction, unless the company, in the opinion of the court or j ury trying the case, establishes that such animal got at large through the negligence...or wilful act or omission of the owner or his agent ; but the fact that such animal was not in charge of some competent person or persons shall not, for... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interstate Commerce - 1906 - 1346 str.
...jurisdiction, unless the company, in the opinion of the court or jury trying the case, establishes that such animal got at large through the negligence or wilful act or omission o_f the owner or his agent, or of the custodian of such animal or his agent; but the fact that such... | |
 | Canada. Parliament. House of Commons - 1906 - 1236 str.
...no animal allowed by law to be at large, and no animal running or being at large without tho actual negligence or wilful act or omission of the owner or his agent, of which negligence the onus of proof shall be upon the comapny, shall be held to be unlawfully or... | |
| |
... got at large through the negligence or wilful act or omission of the owner or his agent... 
