No. 85-652. STONE v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD ET AL. C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 246 U. S. App. D. C. 293, 764 F. 2d 926. No. 85-658. MORGANSTERN ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 771 F. 2d 143. No. 85-671. PRUESSNER ET AL. v. BENTON, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, ET AL. Sup. Ct. Iowa. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 368 N. W. 2d 74. No. 85-672. tiorari denied. COHRAN v. CARLIN ET AL. Sup. Ct. Ga. CerReported below: 254 Ga. 580, 331 S. E. 2d 523. NEGRITO COMERCIAL, S.A. v. SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC., ET AL. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 765 F. 2d 1118. No. 85-677. No. 85-678. UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE CO. ET AL. V. ANIERO CONCRETE CO., INC. Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied. No. 85-692. SHUBA v. AUSTINTOWN BOARD OF EDUCATION. Ct. App. Ohio, Mahoning County. Certiorari denied. No. 85-711. PASCO v. SERVICE. C. A. 9th Cir. C. A. 9th Cir. 772 F.2d 913. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION No. 85-721. STETZ, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ATTWOOD v. GRANT. C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. No. 85-723. MOTTA v. SAMUEL WEISER, INC. C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 768 F. 2d 481. No. 85-730. FARKAS V. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 767 F.2d 907. No. 85-737. PINNEY DOCK & TRANSPORT CO. ET AL. v. PENN CENTRAL CORP. C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 771 F. 2d 762. No. 85-745. HAZELWOOD ET UX. v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 774 F. 2d 1162. No. 85-760. HAFNER v. ALABAMA. Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 474 So. 2d 202. No. 85-783. MARTIN-TRIGONA v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL. C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 246 U. S. App. D. C. 293, 764 F. 2d 926. No. 85-790. CUDDY v. CARMEN, ADMINISTRATOR, GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION. C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 246 U. S. App. D. C. 25, 762 F. 2d 119. No. 85-830. ELLINGTON v. UNITED STATES. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 774 F. 2d 1164. C. A. 6th Cir. No. 85-845. DEMJANJUK v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 767 F. 2d 922. No. 85-846. DEMJANJUK v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 767 F. 2d 922. No. 85-848. DRAGATSIS ET UX. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 774 F. 2d 1168. No. 85-865. No. 85-5900. BLOCK V. UNITED STATES. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 771 F. 2d 83. LAMBERT v. UNITED STATES; and No. 85-869. tiorari denied. No. 85-5278. Dist. LIGHT v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 2d Cir. Cer- BROWN v. FLORIDA. Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th No. 85-5347. NICHOLS v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 3d Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied. No. 85-5356. HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS. C. A. 10th Cir. C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. No. 85-5370. HARRELSON v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 754 F. 2d 1153. No. 85-5372. tiorari denied. LEVITT v. MONROE ET AL. C. A. 5th Cir. Cer- No. 85-5445. IN RE MARTIN-TRIGONA. tiorari denied. C. A. 1st Cir. Cer No. 85-5337. SCHEPPF v. KING, SECRETARY, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. Ct. App. La., 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 468 So. 2d 39. No. 85-5657. RODRIGUEZ v. HOLLAHAN, WARDEN. Ariz. No. 85-5659. Sup. Ct. MALLY v. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. No. 85-5660. DAY v. WETTMAN, JUDGE, ET AL. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. No. 85-5662. rari denied. No. 85-5664. Certiorari denied. No. 85-5666. tiorari denied. No. 85-5667. Certiorari denied. GROSHON v. DOUGLAS. C. A. 10th Cir. Certio WARDEN v. WYRICK, WARDEN. C. A. 8th Cir. BURTON v. EVAN ET AL. C. A. 8th Cir. Cer BURTON v. DIAMOND ET AL. C. A. 6th Cir. No. 85-5668. MALLY V. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY ET AL. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. No. 85-5673. STAMPS v. PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ET AL. F.2d 913. No. 85-5682. GREGORY v. AUGER, WARDEN, ET AL. C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 768 F. 2d 287. No. 85-5684. BOWEN v. FOLTZ, WARDEN, ET AL. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. No. 85-5691. ROMER v. CALIFORNIA. Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied. No. 85-5695. FRAZIER v. PLACER SAVINGS & LOAN ASSN. ET AL. Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied. No. 85-5719. SCANLAND v. ALABAMA. Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 473 So. 2d 1182. No. 85-5721. rari denied. COWELL v. ALABAMA. Sup. Ct. Ala. Certio No. 85-5754. Certiorari denied. No. 85-5758. December 16, 1985 BRYANT v. UNITED STATES. 474 U. S. C. A. 4th Cir. Reported below: 774 F. 2d 1156. OKELLO v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. No. 85-5770. Certiorari denied. No. 85-5772. BROWN v. UNITED STATES. Reported below: 770 F. 2d 768. C. A. 9th Cir. DAVIS v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 7th Cir. Cer tiorari denied. Reported below: 772 F. 2d 1339. No. 85-5773. DERKSEN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. No. 85-5795. YELLEN v. COLORADO. Sup. Ct. Colo. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 704 P. 2d 306. No. 84-750. EASTERN AIR LINES, INC. v. WINBOURNE. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 758 F. 2d 1016. No. 85-237. HENRY ET AL. v. CITY OF DETROIT MANPOWER DEPARTMENT ET AL. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 763 F. 2d 757. JUSTICE WHITE, with whom JUSTICE BLACKMUN joins, dissenting. The issue presented in this case is whether an order denying a civil rights plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is a final decision appealable as a matter of right under 28 U. S. C. § 1291. Three among petitioners are Title VII plaintiffs who moved for and were denied appointment of counsel pursuant to 42 U. S. C. § 2000e−5(f)(1)(B); a fourth petitioner, a plaintiff in an action under 42 U. S. C. § 1983, moved for and was denied appointment of counsel pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1915(d). Petitioners appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which dismissed the appeals on the grounds that the orders denying appointment of counsel are not final for purposes of 28 U. S. C. § 1291. 763 F. 2d 757 (1985). This decision, while not without support among the Courts of Appeals, conflicts with the decisions in Caston v. Sears, Roebuck, & Co., Hattiesburg, Miss., 556 F. 2d 1305 (CA5 1977) (order denying appointment of counsel pursuant to §2000e-5(f)(1)(B) is final for purposes of § 1291), and Slaughter v. City of Maplewood, 731 F. 2d 587 (CA8 1984) (to the same effect). I would grant certiorari to resolve this conflict among the Courts of Appeals on this plainly recurring question. No. 85-307. ESTATE OF ROCKEFELLER ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 762 F. 2d 264. No. 85-461. C. A. 5th Cir. CONTROL DATA CORP. v. C. E. SERVICES, INC. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE BLACKMUN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. below: 759 F. 2d 1241. No. 85-5658. Reported MALLY v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP. ET AL. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE BLACKMUN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Re No. 85-484. MILLER v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE WHITE would grant certiorari. ported below: 763 F. 2d 133. No. 85-570. HOLLOWAY v. WALKER, JUDGE, 162D JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE WHITE would grant certiorari. Reported below: 765 F. 2d 517. No. 85-586. CAYLOR v. CITY OF RED BLUFF ET AL. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied. Ct. App. JUSTICE WHITE, with whom JUSTICE BRENNAN joins, dissenting. In Patsy v. Florida Board of Regents, 457 U. S. 496 (1982), this Court held that exhaustion of state administrative remedies is not a prerequisite to bringing an action in federal court under 42 U. S. C. § 1983. In the present case, the California Court of Appeal held that Patsy applies only in the context of a §1983 suit brought in federal court. Because petitioner was suing in a California court for employment discrimination without having exhausted the possibility of remedies through a complaint to the California Fair Employment Practices Commission, his § 1983 suit was held properly dismissed. This holding postponing the federal |
