Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United StatesUnited States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 6-10 z 100
Strana 67
... apply , we are relegated to the legislative history . The courts are directed to apply " reasonable assumptions " to gov- ern the tracing of funds , and the House Report identifies one such assumption to be that any voluntary ...
... apply , we are relegated to the legislative history . The courts are directed to apply " reasonable assumptions " to gov- ern the tracing of funds , and the House Report identifies one such assumption to be that any voluntary ...
Strana 68
... apply ' rea- sonable assumptions ' to govern the tracing of funds . " Ante , at 67 ( emphasis added ) . I do not agree . Congress conveys its directions in the Statutes at Large , not in excerpts from the Congressional Record , much ...
... apply ' rea- sonable assumptions ' to govern the tracing of funds . " Ante , at 67 ( emphasis added ) . I do not agree . Congress conveys its directions in the Statutes at Large , not in excerpts from the Congressional Record , much ...
Strana 73
... apply " where an employee " deliberately causes a vi- olation of any requirement of this Act or the Atomic Energy Act " - reflects a congressional desire to preclude all relief , including state rem- edies , to a whistle - blower who ...
... apply " where an employee " deliberately causes a vi- olation of any requirement of this Act or the Atomic Energy Act " - reflects a congressional desire to preclude all relief , including state rem- edies , to a whistle - blower who ...
Strana 80
... plainly implied ) to exclude state regulation . Nevertheless , because we previously have adverted to the three - category framework , we invoke and apply it here . 72 122 Opinion of the Court § 2011 et seq 80 OCTOBER TERM , 1989.
... plainly implied ) to exclude state regulation . Nevertheless , because we previously have adverted to the three - category framework , we invoke and apply it here . 72 122 Opinion of the Court § 2011 et seq 80 OCTOBER TERM , 1989.
Strana 87
... apply " where an employee " delib- erately causes a violation of any requirement of this Act or of the Atomic Energy Act . " According to the District Court and respondent , this section reflects a congressional desire to preclude all ...
... apply " where an employee " delib- erately causes a violation of any requirement of this Act or of the Atomic Energy Act . " According to the District Court and respondent , this section reflects a congressional desire to preclude all ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
action activities American Trucking Assns amici curiae apply Arkansas Supreme Court Assn Attorney authority award BRENNAN certification certiorari checkpoint Chevron Oil civil claim club Commerce Clause concurring in judgment Congress constitutional Corp County Court of Appeals debtor decision dissenting 496 U. S. District Court Eleventh Amendment enforcement Establishment Clause estoppel federal law fees filed flag flat tax Florida Fourth Amendment funds Government held HUE tax Illinois issue jurisdiction JUSTICE lawyers legislative letterhead litigation Martinez-Fuerte McKesson ment militia Miranda Miranda warnings misleading National Guard NBTA noncurriculum related officer Opinion of O'CONNOR payment petitioner petitioner's plain view police pre-empted prohibit reasonable refund relief religious remedy respondent retroactivity Rule 11 Scheiner School Dist seizure sobriety checkpoint sovereign immunity speech stare decisis State's statute statutory STEVENS student groups supra Supremacy Clause Supreme Court Texaco tion tional trial United violation warrant Westside Widmar