Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, in the Year ..., Svazek 55Edward O. Jenkins, 1876 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 6-10 z 86
Strana 20
... decision , foreshadowed by the court , had been one in denial of the motion , perhaps it would have been too late to withdraw ; but we do not see why a victory may not be declined in the very moment of success . Men do not always know ...
... decision , foreshadowed by the court , had been one in denial of the motion , perhaps it would have been too late to withdraw ; but we do not see why a victory may not be declined in the very moment of success . Men do not always know ...
Strana 33
... decision . WILLIAM S. BASINGER , by JACKSON & CLARKE , for plain- tiff in error . RUFUS E. LESTER ; MELDRIM & ADAMS , for defendants . WARNER , Chief Justice . This was a bill filed by the complainant against the de- fendant , praying ...
... decision . WILLIAM S. BASINGER , by JACKSON & CLARKE , for plain- tiff in error . RUFUS E. LESTER ; MELDRIM & ADAMS , for defendants . WARNER , Chief Justice . This was a bill filed by the complainant against the de- fendant , praying ...
Strana 35
... decision will prevent a multiplicity of suits . In view of the evidence before the presiding judge , as contained in the record , we will not control the exercise of his discretion in granting the injunction prayed for . Let the ...
... decision will prevent a multiplicity of suits . In view of the evidence before the presiding judge , as contained in the record , we will not control the exercise of his discretion in granting the injunction prayed for . Let the ...
Strana 41
... decision . BLANDFORD & GARRARD ; H. L. BENNING ; McCAY & TRIPPE , for plaintiff in error . WILLIS & WILLIS ; E. H. WORRILL , for defendants . VOL . LV . 4 . 33335 55 93 26 47 41 Brown vs. Kimbrough et al . WARNER , Chief Justice ATLANTA ...
... decision . BLANDFORD & GARRARD ; H. L. BENNING ; McCAY & TRIPPE , for plaintiff in error . WILLIS & WILLIS ; E. H. WORRILL , for defendants . VOL . LV . 4 . 33335 55 93 26 47 41 Brown vs. Kimbrough et al . WARNER , Chief Justice ATLANTA ...
Strana 47
... decision , in reply to the suggestion that the bond need not have been under seal , and therefore the authority need not be under seal , “ Not so . The question was whether Taylor had authority to sign this bond , sealed as it is ...
... decision , in reply to the suggestion that the bond need not have been under seal , and therefore the authority need not be under seal , “ Not so . The question was whether Taylor had authority to sign this bond , sealed as it is ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
action adm'r administrator affidavit agent alleged amend amount bill of exceptions BLECKLEY bond certiorari charged the jury Chief Justice claim claimant Code common law Company complainant contract cotton counsel court erred court of equity creditor damages debt debtor deceased declaration deed defendant in error defendant's demurrer discharge dismissed Dortic Dugas equity evidence execution executors facts fee simple fendant filed fraud garnishment Georgia Reports granted ground homestead husband Ibid illegal indictment injunction issue JACKSON Jones Judge Judgment reversed land Let the judgment letter levy lien ment mortgage mortgagor motion notice opinion overruled paid party payment plaintiff in error plea pleadings possession principal purchase money question Railroad record refused remaindermen sheriff sold Sons & Company statute statute of limitations sued suit Superior Court tenant term thereof tion trial trust usury verdict wife witness