Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, in the Year ..., Svazek 55Edward O. Jenkins, 1876 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 6-10 z 75
Strana x
... et al . , 466 Wiece vs. Marbut et al . , Varnell , agent , et al . vs. Speer , agent ,. Williams vs. Harkins , 132 Williams vs. The State ,. Varner & Ellington adv . Radcliffe Wilson & Co. vs. Sprague Mow- & Lamb , .. Varner et al . vs ...
... et al . , 466 Wiece vs. Marbut et al . , Varnell , agent , et al . vs. Speer , agent ,. Williams vs. Harkins , 132 Williams vs. The State ,. Varner & Ellington adv . Radcliffe Wilson & Co. vs. Sprague Mow- & Lamb , .. Varner et al . vs ...
Strana 15
Georgia. Supreme Court. Ordinary vs. Smith et al . 3d . Because the court erred in holding that said decree operated as an estoppel on claimant , and that the judgments of plaintiff ... et al . be not set out ATLANTA , JULY TERM , 1875 . 15.
Georgia. Supreme Court. Ordinary vs. Smith et al . 3d . Because the court erred in holding that said decree operated as an estoppel on claimant , and that the judgments of plaintiff ... et al . be not set out ATLANTA , JULY TERM , 1875 . 15.
Strana 21
Georgia. Supreme Court. Branch , Sons & Company vs. DuBose et al . BRANCH , SONS & COMPANY , plaintiffs in error , vs. SUSAN DUBOSE et al . , defendants in error . 1. A continuance will not be granted because counsel is surprised at the ...
Georgia. Supreme Court. Branch , Sons & Company vs. DuBose et al . BRANCH , SONS & COMPANY , plaintiffs in error , vs. SUSAN DUBOSE et al . , defendants in error . 1. A continuance will not be granted because counsel is surprised at the ...
Strana 25
... et al . , plaintiffs in error , vs. SIMEON WAL- TERS , defendant in error . 1. Where land was conveyed to B. , the wife of C , for her sole and separate use , and for the use of her children born and to be born by the said C. , to have ...
... et al . , plaintiffs in error , vs. SIMEON WAL- TERS , defendant in error . 1. Where land was conveyed to B. , the wife of C , for her sole and separate use , and for the use of her children born and to be born by the said C. , to have ...
Strana 41
Georgia. Supreme Court. Brown vs. Kimbrough et al . could be no question upon his liability to be served . " This would seem to cover the third point as to whether service ... et al . WARNER , Chief Justice ATLANTA , JULY TERM , 1875 . 41.
Georgia. Supreme Court. Brown vs. Kimbrough et al . could be no question upon his liability to be served . " This would seem to cover the third point as to whether service ... et al . WARNER , Chief Justice ATLANTA , JULY TERM , 1875 . 41.
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
action adm'r administrator affidavit agent alleged amend amount bill of exceptions BLECKLEY bond certiorari charged the jury Chief Justice claim claimant Code common law Company complainant contract cotton counsel court erred court of equity creditor damages debt debtor deceased declaration deed defendant in error defendant's demurrer discharge dismissed Dortic Dugas equity evidence execution executors facts fee simple fendant filed fraud garnishment Georgia Reports granted ground homestead husband Ibid illegal indictment injunction issue JACKSON Jones Judge Judgment reversed land Let the judgment letter levy lien ment mortgage mortgagor motion notice opinion overruled paid party payment plaintiff in error plea pleadings possession principal purchase money question Railroad record refused remaindermen sheriff sold Sons & Company statute statute of limitations sued suit Superior Court tenant term thereof tion trial trust usury verdict wife witness