Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United StatesUnited States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 6-10 z 100
Strana 128
... officer did not find the stolen property but did find the weapons in plain view and seized them . The trial court refused to suppress the seized evidence , and Horton was convicted of armed rob- bery . The California Court of Appeal ...
... officer did not find the stolen property but did find the weapons in plain view and seized them . The trial court refused to suppress the seized evidence , and Horton was convicted of armed rob- bery . The California Court of Appeal ...
Strana 129
... officer must have a lawful right of access to the object itself . Justice Harlan , who concurred in the Coolidge judg- ment but did not join the plurality's plain - view discussion , may well have rested his vote on the fact that the ...
... officer must have a lawful right of access to the object itself . Justice Harlan , who concurred in the Coolidge judg- ment but did not join the plurality's plain - view discussion , may well have rested his vote on the fact that the ...
Strana 130
... officer , investi- gated the crime and determined that there was probable cause to search petitioner's home for the proceeds of the rob- * Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the United States by Solicitor General ...
... officer , investi- gated the crime and determined that there was probable cause to search petitioner's home for the proceeds of the rob- * Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the United States by Solicitor General ...
Strana 131
... officer viewed other handguns and rifles , he did not seize them because there was no probable cause to believe they were associated with criminal activity . App . 30 ; see Arizona v . Hicks , 480 U. S. 321 , 327 ( 1987 ) . 2 " In ...
... officer viewed other handguns and rifles , he did not seize them because there was no probable cause to believe they were associated with criminal activity . App . 30 ; see Arizona v . Hicks , 480 U. S. 321 , 327 ( 1987 ) . 2 " In ...
Strana 132
... officers . Justice Stewart was of the opinion that the ' plain - view ' doctrine is applicable only to the inadvertent discovery of in- criminating evidence . " If the plurality opinion in Coolidge were entitled to binding effect as ...
... officers . Justice Stewart was of the opinion that the ' plain - view ' doctrine is applicable only to the inadvertent discovery of in- criminating evidence . " If the plurality opinion in Coolidge were entitled to binding effect as ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
action activities American Trucking Assns amici curiae apply Arkansas Supreme Court Assn Attorney authority award BRENNAN certification certiorari checkpoint Chevron Oil civil claim club Commerce Clause concurring in judgment Congress constitutional Corp County Court of Appeals debtor decision dissenting 496 U. S. District Court Eleventh Amendment enforcement Establishment Clause estoppel federal law fees filed flag flat tax Florida Fourth Amendment funds Government held HUE tax Illinois issue jurisdiction JUSTICE lawyers legislative letterhead litigation Martinez-Fuerte McKesson ment militia Miranda Miranda warnings misleading National Guard NBTA noncurriculum related officer Opinion of O'CONNOR payment petitioner petitioner's plain view police pre-empted prohibit reasonable refund relief religious remedy respondent retroactivity Rule 11 Scheiner School Dist seizure sobriety checkpoint sovereign immunity speech stare decisis State's statute statutory STEVENS student groups supra Supremacy Clause Supreme Court Texaco tion tional trial United violation warrant Westside Widmar