 In that case the condition of the policy was that it should be void if the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership, or if the building insured should be upon ground not owned by the insured in fee simple.  American Law Reports Annotated - Strana 6321927Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | Charles Burke Elliott - 1907 - 692 str.
...it was held that the insurance was valid, although the policy contained a condition declaring it to be void if the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership, although it appeared that he did not own the legal title and had merely purchased the property and... | |
 | 1908 - 1162 str.
...Itself of Its defense to an action on the policy. In that case the condition of the policy was that It should be void if the interest of the Insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership, or If the building Insured should be upon ground not owned by the insured in fee simple. In this case... | |
 | Edward B. Evans - 1912 - 1048 str.
...provided that the answers of the plaintiff contained in its application were warranted to be true, and that the entire policy should be void, if the interest of the insured in the property were not truly stated, and that no officer, agent, or other representative of the company,... | |
 | 1912 - 1320 str.
...German-American Ins. Co. 73 Mo. App. ]5S, it was held that a stipulation of a policy providing that it should be void if the interest of the insured was other than the unconditional and sole ownership, or if the subject of the insurance was a building on ground not... | |
 | William Frederick Elliott - 1913 - 1292 str.
...it was held that the insurance was valid, although the policy contained a condition declaring it to be void if the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership, although it appeared that he did not own the legal title and had merely purchased the property and... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, Martin L. Newell, Mason Harder Newell, Walter Clyde Jones, Keene Harwood Addington, Basil Jones, James Max Henderson, Ray Smith - 1913 - 738 str.
...devolved upon the defendant, in order to render the policy void under the provisions invoked, to show that the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership. The fifth instruction given for the plaintiff, which directed a verdict, should have negatived the... | |
 | William Reynolds Vance - 1914 - 782 str.
...insurance ; (2) if with the knowledge of the insured foreclosure proceedings should be commenced ; (3) if the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership; (4) if any change should take place in the interest, title, or possession of the subject of insurance,... | |
 | Barry Mohun - 1914 - 1144 str.
...plaintiffs without endorsing on the policy what was required by its printed terms, viz., a mention that the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership. Plaintiffs, TEXAS DECISIONS. 867 by their contract with their consignor, were obligated to fully insure... | |
 | Eugene Allen Gilmore, William Charles Wermuth - 1915 - 858 str.
...fire, and they and the corn in them were destroyed. The policy contained the following provisions : (1) That the entire policy should be void if the interest of the insured in the property be not truly stated therein; (2) that the entire policy should be void if the hazard... | |
 | Ohio. Courts - 1915 - 648 str.
...to prove the delivery of proofs of loss to the company within sixty days after the fire. Third, that the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership. L This first point was not raised during the trial of the case but was advanced for the first time... | |
| |
