 In that case the condition of the policy was that it should be void if the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership, or if the building insured should be upon ground not owned by the insured in fee simple.  American Law Reports Annotated - Strana 6321927Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | 1917 - 740 str.
..."false swearing by the insured touching any matter relating to this insurance," or that they show that "the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership," as provided in the policy. And as the jury, under the way the cause was tried and submitted to it by... | |
 | Frederic Clarke Morse - 1917 - 880 str.
...Ins. Co. v. Smith (Tex. Civ. App.) 29 S. W. 264. 388. A condition, in a policy on a building, that it should be void if the interest of the Insured was other than sole ownership, or If the building was on ground not owned by the assured in fee simple, Is not broken... | |
 | Roger William Cooley, Lawrence Vold - 1919 - 928 str.
...insured for a specified sum a dwelling, and for a specified sum household goods therein, and stipulated that the "entire policy" should be void if the interest of the insured in the property was not truly stated. The building was located on unsurveyed government land, and the... | |
 | 1919 - 1288 str.
...the court, in HANKINS v. WILLIAMSBURG CITY F. INS. Co. ante, 373, decided that the provision that the policy should be void if the interest of the insured was other than the unconditional and sole ownership was not violate'd, where the insured had the pquitable title,... | |
 | 1904 - 822 str.
...Baldwin, 79 Fed. 95, 24 CCA 453. The policy which was issued provided, among other things, that it should be void if the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership. Whether if a policy had issued insuring Baldwin as sole and unconditional owner, without qualifying... | |
 | John Simpson - 1921 - 224 str.
...inoperative by reason of the fact that the interest of the insured was not truly stated therein, and that the "interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership," as required by the policy, in that prior to the date of its issuance the title to the property covered... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1925 - 974 str.
...then the learned judge continues at page 639 (56 SE 586): "The condition of the policy was that it should be void if the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership, or if the building insured should be upon ground not owned by the insured in fee simple. It appears... | |
 | 1903
...Baldwin, 79 Fed. 95, 24 CCA 453. The policy which was issued provided, among other things, that it should be void if the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership. Whether if z policy had issued insuring Baldwin as sole and unconditional owner, without qualifying... | |
 | 1924 - 1100 str.
...property; third, because there was no proof of loss and no valid waiver of such proof ; fourth, because the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership. [1] 1. The first contention cannot be sustained. Where a policy is made payable to a mortgagee as his... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1908 - 796 str.
...itself of its defence to an action on the policy. In that case the condition of the policy was, that it should be void if the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership, or if the building insured should be upon ground not owned by the insured in fee simple. In this case,... | |
| |
