 | Charles Hodge - 1879 - 556 str.
...court, is a case of this kind. Where an officer is not removable at the will of the appointing power, the appointment is not revocable and cannot be annulled, it has conferred legal rights which cannot be resumed.")' The act of the state appointing certain judges was therefore of the nature of a contract... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1882 - 758 str.
...; and the commission may be arrested, if still in the office. But when the officer is not removable at the will of the executive, the appointment is not revocable, and cannot be annulled. It has cou• "erred legal rights which cannot be resumed. The discretion of the executive is to be exercised... | |
 | John T. Cook - 1885 - 874 str.
...revocable; and the commission may be arrested, if still in the office. But when the officer is not removable at the will of the executive, the appointment is not...annulled. It has conferred legal rights which cannot be reserved. The discretion of the executive is to be exercised until the appointment has been made. But... | |
 | Lucius P. Little - 1887 - 678 str.
...; and the commission may be arrested, if still in the office. But when the officer is not removable at the will of the executive, the appointment is not revocable and can not be annulled. It has conferred legal rights which can not be resumed. " 'The discretion of the... | |
 | 1888 - 942 str.
...revocable; and the commission may be arrested, if still in the office. But when the officer is not removable at the will of the executive the appointment is not...annulled. It has conferred legal rights which cannot be resumed. The discretion of the executive is to be exercised until the appointment has been made. But... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1892 - 768 str.
...revocable; and the commission may be arrested, if still in the office. But when the officer is not removable at the will of the executive the appointment is not...annulled. It has conferred legal rights which cannot be resumed." Again : " Mr. Marbury, then, since his commission Opinion of the Court. [as a Justice of... | |
 | Edwin Eustace Bryant - 1901 - 480 str.
...is of no concern, because the act is at any time revocable. But where the officer is not removable at the will of the Executive, the appointment is not revocable and can not be annulled. This was held, but as the Supreme Court had no original jurisdiction to compel... | |
 | John Marshall - 1903 - 828 str.
...revocable; and the commission may be arrested, if still in the office. But when the officer is not removable at the will of the executive, the appointment is not...annulled. It has conferred legal rights which cannot be resumed. The discretion of the executive is to be exercised until the appointment has been made. But... | |
| |
Where an officer is removable at the will of the executive, the circumstance which completes his appointment is of no concern, because the act is at any time revocable; and the commission may be arrested, if still in the office. But when the officer is... 
