 portion last above quoted], it is not perceived that there is any limit to the questions which can be adjusted touching any matter which is properly the subject of negotiation with a foreign country"—citing cases, including our  American Law Reports Annotated - Strana 6361922Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1978 - 168 str.
...without its consent. Fort Leaventoorth Railroad Co. v. Lowe. 114 US 523, 041. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that there is any limit to the questions which can lie adjusted touching any matter which is properly the subject of negotiation with a foreign country."... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1978 - 786 str.
...Railroad ">;. v. Lowe, 114 T'.S. ~i'l~i, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that liere is any limit to the questions which can be adjusted touching any matter .vhich is properly (lie subject of negotiation with a foreign country.' 4. Whether, as the Court said,... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1977 - 174 str.
...Court declared in Oeofroy v. Riggs 133 US 258, 267 (1896), the treaty-making power may l>e exercised on any matter "which is properly the subject of negotiation with a foreign country". The United States is a party to numerous international agreements relating to the activities... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1977 - 166 str.
...Court declared in Geofroy v. Rigg» 133 US 258, 267 (1890), the treaty-making power may be exercised on any matter "which is properly the subject of negotiation with a foreign country". The United States is a party to numerous international agreements relating to the activities... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries - 1978 - 352 str.
...without its consent. Fort Lrarcnwnrth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that there is any limit to the...properly the subject of negotiation with a foreign country. Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dalí. 199; Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259; Ilaucnstein v. Lynham, 100 US... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1978 - 818 str.
...without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co., v. Lowe, 114 US 525. 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that there is any limit to the...properly the subject of negotiation with a foreign country. Ware v. Hi/lton. 3 Dalí. 199 ; Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259 ; Haventtein v. Lynham, 100... | |
| |
