 | 1913 - 1134 str.
...has conducted himself In doing the business which It was the act of the master to place him in. * * * With respect to the question whether a principal Is...business, and for his master's benefit, no sensible fraud and the case of any other wrong." The legal rule, thus laid down, is approved in Swire v. Francis,... | |
 | 1886 - 968 str.
...inability of a corporate body to have a wrongful intention was not raised. The court however say: " But with respect to the question, whether a principal is answerable for the act of liis agent in the course of his master's business, and for his master's benefit, no sensible distinction... | |
 | Joel Prentiss Bishop - 1887 - 824 str.
...sub-title,6 we saw under what circumstances a suit may be maintained, or not, Stiles, 43 Conn. 426. " With respect to the question, whether a principal...the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as... | |
 | A. de Mornay Bidoulac - 1887 - 428 str.
...his employment,* but not for his wilful and malicious acts f A principal is answerable for the acts of his agent in the course of his master's business, and for hia master's benefit, and for every aach wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course... | |
 | Judah Philip Benjamin - 1888 - 1034 str.
...fraud to the principal, but because (as it was well put by Mr. Justice Willes in Barwick's case) " with respect to the question, whether a principal...his agent in the course of his master's business, no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong." And... | |
 | MARSHALL D. EWELL - 1888 - 368 str.
...acts which he was put in the master's place to do, and was committed for the master's purposes. And "no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong." 2. — Slander of Title. The wrong called Slander of Title is in truth a special variety of deceit,... | |
 | Judah Philip Benjamin - 1888 - 810 str.
...Willes in Barwick's case) " with respect to the question, whether a principal is answerable [*437] for the act of his. agent in * the course of his master's business, no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong." And... | |
 | Ontario. High Court of Justice - 1889 - 884 str.
...Barwick FIBGUSON, J. v. English Joint Stock Bank, L. R. 2 Ex. 259, by Mr. Justice Willes.at p. 265, is: " With respect to the question whether a principal is...distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the ease of any wrong. The general rule is that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant... | |
 | Frederick Pollock - 1890 - 694 str.
...judgment of the Exchequer Chamber delivered by Willes J. in Baeieick v. English Joint Slock Bank. " With respect to the question, whether a principal...distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud andjthe case of any_other wrong " (i•). This has been more than once fully approved in the Privy... | |
 | Tindal Arthur Pearson - 1890 - 530 str.
...and that the fraud was properly laid as the fraud of the defendants. Mr. Justice Willes said : — " With respect to the question whether a principal is answerable for the acts of his agent in the course of his master's business, and for his master's benefit, no sensible... | |
| |
But with respect to the question whether a principal is answerable for the act of his agent in the course of his master's business, and for his master's benefit, no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other... 
