 | William Mark McKinney, Burdett Alberto Rich - 1917 - 1360 str.
...assumed the risks of his employment in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee." Wherefore it is clear, says the supreme court, "that the assumption of risk as a defense is abolished... | |
 | United States - 1917 - 234 str.
...assumed the risks of his employment in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee. SEC. 5. That any contract, rule, regulation, or device whatsoever, the purpose or intent of which shall... | |
 | Panama Canal (Panama) - 1917 - 232 str.
...assumed the risks of his employment in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee. SEC. 5. That any contract, rule, regulation, or device whatsoever, the purpose or intent of which shall... | |
 | Ohio. Circuit Court - 1917 - 634 str.
...assumed the risks of his employment in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employees." It was claimed by counsel for defendant in this case that, because Flannery was a trespasser... | |
 | United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics - 1918 - 1442 str.
...assumed the risk of his employment in any case where a violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury, or death, of such employee.' I decline to charge as requested, because this is not an action of the kind specified in section 4."... | |
 | Needham Calvin Collier - 1918 - 722 str.
...thereunder as at common laws save in "any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee." There are other decisions which touch upon construction of the Safety Appliance Act, but none as to... | |
 | William Otis Badger - 1918 - 1030 str.
...his employment in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any United States statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee. Instruction No. 3 stated the provisions of section 2 of the Safety Appliance Act requiring cars to... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1918 - 1016 str.
...guilty of contributory negligence in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee." This is an express adoption of the doctrine first laid down in Greenlee v. RR, 122 NC, 977, and Troxler... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1918 - 808 str.
...assumed the risks of his employment in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee." That the Federal Boiler Inspection Act was enacted for the safety of employees is obvious. Section... | |
| |
Provided, That no such employee who may be injured or killed shall be held to have been guilty of contributory negligence in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury... 
