 | John Adams - 1854 - 734 str.
...Per Boyle, Ch. J., delivering the opinion of the court ; Colston v. M' Kay, 1 Marsh. (Ky.) Rep. 251. In ejectment, a plaintiff must recover on the strength...defendant cannot avail himself of this rule against a plaintiff whom he has fraudulently induced to purchase a weak title. Laneetal. v. Reynard, (in error,)... | |
 | Simon Greenleaf - 1854 - 784 str.
...a general rule in all these actions, as we have already remarked in respect to Ejectments, that the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of his adversary's ; and that he must show, that he has the legal interest, and a possessory title, not... | |
 | John Bouvier - 1854 - 756 str.
...Jlrt. 2. — Of evidence far the defendant in ejectment. 3674. The principle already stated, that the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of that of his adversary, is so firmly established, that but little can be said about the evidence required... | |
 | Alexander James - 1855 - 490 str.
...from a party whom he by his action admits to be in possession of the whole. He must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant's. — And his case is not strengthened by the fact that he is taking advantage of defendant's neglect... | |
 | Florida. Supreme Court - 1855 - 834 str.
...either in the defendant himself or in some other person. A plaintiff in ejectment must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant's. It is all important that neither of us should be carried away by the appeals of counsel or sympathy... | |
 | Alexander James - 1855 - 488 str.
...from a party whom he by his action admits to be in possession of the whole. He must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant's.— And his case is not strengthened by the fact that he is taking advantage of defendant's neglect in... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1880 - 730 str.
...JOHN V. EUSTACE, Judge, presiding. Messrs. J. & J. "W. McCov, for the appellants: In ejectment, the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant's. Marshall v. Baker, 35 111. 106 ; Hague v. Porter, 45 id. 318. Brief for the Appellants. The plaintiff... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - 1862 - 660 str.
...the defendant, and there was no evidence that the defendant knew or assented to this agreement. The plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant's. If the plaintiff is not entitled to judgment in his own right, he is not entitled to judgment in this... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1862 - 1096 str.
...agreement of the parties. JUbiese vs. Knapp, 942 EJECTMENT. 1. A plaintiff in ejectment must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant's title. Stanford vs. Mangtn et a2., £v> 2. Where the proof shows, that the defendant in an action of... | |
 | Joseph S. Bosworth, New York (State). Superior Court (New York) - 1864 - 772 str.
...appellant. I. This being an action of ejectment, the plaintiff must Brady v. Hcanion. recover ou the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant's; and if ho shows no paper title to the strip claimed, he cannot recover, though tho defendant should... | |
| |
But a mere intruder cannot enter on a person actually seized and eject him, and then question his title or set up an outstanding title in another. The maxim that the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the... 
