| 1918 - 1300 str.
...sale may be enjoined, and this was all the relief given by the decree Iwlow. Defendants insist that plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of defendants' claim. This undoubtedly is the rule in actions for the recovery of real property, but tins... | |
| Austin Abbott - 1918 - 968 str.
...not avail a defendant who is a stranger to the title. Robie v. Sedgwick, 4 Abb. Ct. App. Dec. 73. The plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title and not on the weakness of his adversary's. Thurman v. Leach (Ky.),116S. W. Rep. 300. A deed under which both parties claim, was... | |
| 1919 - 1064 str.
...recover unpatented mining claims, the ordinary rule in actions of ejectment to the effect that the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title and not on the weakness of his adversary's title docs not apply. The rule is that in possessory actions for mining claims the... | |
| Virginia - 1919 - 1856 str.
...SE 553. Possession, Effect of. — A plaintiff in ejectment must, as a general rule, recover on the strength of his own title and not on the weakness of the defendant, but if he is in actual possession he may, on the strength of his possession alone, recover... | |
| 1920 - 740 str.
...Criminal Law, <®=»11S6. EJECTMENT. I. RIGHT OF ACTION AND DEFENSES. <g=9(3) (USCCAW Va.) In ejectment, plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant's title. — Thomas v. Lukens, 505. ELECTION OF REMEDIES. See Bankruptcy, ®=»296, 363. ELECTRICITY.... | |
| 1920 - 1280 str.
...<S=»6(1)— PLAINTIFF MUST RECOVER ON STRENGTH OF HIS OWN TITLE. In action for trespass to try title, plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on want of title in defendant. 4. TRESPASS то TRY TITLE <S=38(1)— DIRECTION OF VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF... | |
| Henry Roscoe - 1922 - 728 str.
...V. Curling, 53 LJ QB 373; 13 QBD 262. Proof of a sufficient title. — By тете possession.] The plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant's. Mariin v. Slrachan, 5 TR 107, 110, п.; Dan/ont v. M'Anulty, 52 LJQB 652, 655; 8 App. Cas. 456, 462.... | |
| 1922 - 1150 str.
...legal title to the lands in controversy. The rule is well established that in an ejectment action the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the title of his adversary. Linam v. Beck, 51 Okl. 727, 152 Рас. 344 ; Lynch v. Calkins, 75 Okl. 137,... | |
| Daniel Woolsey Crockett - 1922 - 1014 str.
...recovery In ejectment on such duplicate receipt. Adams v. Couch. 1 Okla. 17. 26 Pac. 1009. In ejectment, plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of defendant's. (1894) Hurst v. Sawyer, 2 Okla. 470. 37 Pac. 817; (1898) Myers v. Mathis, 2 Ind. Ter.... | |
| Benjamin Jonson Shipman - 1923 - 686 str.
...84 Tex. 562, 19 SW 778, 31 Am. St. Rep. SO. 2 » As in ejectment, the plaintiff must recover on thfe strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant's; and he must rely on his Writs of Entry » The remedy of writ of entry was a real action, and was, with... | |
| |