 | William Blake Odgers - 1881 - 836 str.
...or we should neither have purity of taste nor of morals. Fair discussion is' essentially necessary to the truth of history and the advancement of science....literature, or to censure what is hostile to morality." "God forbid," exclaims Alderson, B. in Gathcrcole v. Miall, 15 M. & W. 340, " God forbid that you should... | |
 | 1883 - 876 str.
...allowed, or we should neither have purity of taste nor of morals. Fair discussion is essentially necessary to the truth of history and the advancement of science....literature, or to censure what is hostile to morality." Subsequently, several questions of pleading having been gone into, the defendant admitted that the... | |
 | George Elliott - 1884 - 202 str.
...have neither purity of taste nor of morals. Fair discussion Elleuborou 8 • is essentially necessary to the truth of history and the advancement of science. That publication, therefore, I should never consider as a libel which has for its object not to injure the reputation of any individual,... | |
 | William Blake Odgers - 1887 - 1174 str.
...allowed, or we sheuld neither have purity of taste nor of morals. Fair discussion is essentially necessary to the truth of history and the advancement of science....vicious taste in literature, or to censure what is hestile to morality." " A critic must confine himself to criticism, and not make it the veil for personal... | |
 | 1889 - 570 str.
...allowed, or we should have neither purity of taste nor of morals. Fair discussion is essentially necessary to the truth of history and the advancement of science....to injure the reputation of any individual, but to cancel misrepresentation of fact, to refute sophistical reasoning, to expose a vicious taste in literature,... | |
 | John Houston Merrill, Thomas Johnson Michie, Charles Frederic Williams, David Shephard Garland - 1890 - 1240 str.
...allowed, or we should have neither purity of taste nor of morals. Fair discussion is essentially necessary to the truth of history and the advancement of science....literature, or to censure what is hostile to morality.' 'A critic must confine himself to criticism, and not make it the veil for personal censure, nor allow... | |
 | John Townshend - 1890 - 972 str.
...allowed, or we should have neither purity of taste or of morals. Fair discussion is essentially necessary to the truth of history and the advancement of science....to injure the reputation of any individual, but to 1 Gathercole v. Miall, 15 M. & W. ness of their inferences, provided they 319. are not actuated by... | |
 | Canada - 1894 - 1076 str.
...94. (2) Odgers' Lib. 4 SI. 34. history and the advancement of science. That publication, therefore, 1 shall never consider as a libel, which has for its...literature, or to censure what is hostile to morality." (1) But "A critic must confine himsolf to criticism, and not make it the veil for personal censure,... | |
 | Frank Towers Cooper - 1894 - 404 str.
...criticism exceeds the bounds of fairness. Thus it was once said by a most distinguished English lawyer— "That publication, therefore, I shall never consider...the reputation " of any individual, but to correct misrepresentation of fact— " to refute sophistical reasoning, to expose a vicious taste " in literature,... | |
| |
Liberty of criticism must be allowed, or we should have neither purity of taste nor of morals. Fair discussion is essentially necessary to the truth of history and the advancement of science. That publication, therefore, I shall never consider as a libel... 
