 | Milton C. Jacobs - 1950 - 312 str.
...Hotchkiss, 256 NY 41; Trustees of Southampton v. Betts, 163 NY 454; McRoberts v. Bergman, 132 NY 73). The rule that a plaintiff in ejectment must recover...asserted against title, but not to a case where the defendant, making no claim of title, objects that the plaintiff has not proved a perfect title against... | |
 | 1920 - 700 str.
...with land bordering along that channel. In an action of ejectment the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title and not on the weakness of his adversary's: Hammond v. Shepard, 186 111. 235 ; Phelps v. Nazworthy, 226 111. 254; Terhune v. Porter, 212 111. 595.... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs - 1953 - 1896 str.
...by someone else, it is fundamental that the one challenging the right of possession must rely on the strength of his own title and not on the weakness of his adversary's. So the United States should not be allowed to rely on the weakness of the title of the State of California... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs - 1953 - 1468 str.
...by someone else, it is fundamental that the one challenging the right of possession must rely on the strength of his own title and not on the weakness of his adversary's. So the United States should not he allowed to rely on the weakness of the title of the State of California... | |
 | Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Edward Bell Green, Frank Dale, John Henry Burford, Robert Lee Williams, Matthew John Kane, Howard J. Parker, Charles Winfield Van Eaton - 1916 - 756 str.
...entered of record, would be a nullity and void. 1. Ejectment— Right of Action— Title of Plaintiff. Plaintiff in ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title, and not upon the weakness of that of his adversary. (Syllabus by Riimmons, C.) Action by CR Smith and others... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1899 - 714 str.
...is a matter of no consequence whether the appellants had any title or not. The plaintiff is bound to recover upon the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of that of his adversary. (Wliitford v. Drexel, supra). The propositions of law, submitted by the appellants... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1900 - 712 str.
...interfering with easement of right of way held by private party under lease from the city 387 EJECTMENT. a plaintiff in ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title and not upon the weakness of the title of the defendant 235 purchaser^ foreclosure who fails to take out... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1900 - 716 str.
...did or could deny that Purcell had had title, and as the plaintiff was bound to recover, if at all, upon the strength of his own title and not on the weakness of the defendant's, it devolved on him to prove that his right was superior to the defendant's. But did... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1878 - 722 str.
...the defendant's title, before he can recover. He, if at all, recovers on the strength and perfection of his own title, and not on the weakness of his adversary's title. The mere production of a deed from one person to another does not tend to prove title. It must... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1886 - 802 str.
...Opinion of the Court. did. It is a familiar principle that a plaintiff in ejectment must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of his adversary. It is no matter whether the title is in defendants or not. If it is in any one other than... | |
| |
The rule that a plaintiff in ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title and not on the weakness of his adversary's... 
