 | 1912 - 1250 str.
...upon the plaintiff the burden of proving title to the land in controversy, agreeably to the general rule that a plaintiff in ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title. These instructions properly ignored the numerous exceptions to that rule, since there Is no evidence... | |
 | 1884 - 1002 str.
...action of ejectment in favor of the latter and against the former. In such an action the plaintiff must recover upon the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendants' title. (Jardiner v. Tisdale, 2 Wie. 152. The finding of fact that the lands in question... | |
 | 1909 - 1180 str.
...B. Dec. 19, 1908. Headnotes Filed Jan. 30. 1909.) 1. EJECTMENT (§ 9*)— TITLE то SUPPORT ACTION. A plaintiff in ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title, and not upon the weakness of his adversary's. He cannot recover as against one without title, unless he... | |
 | 1886 - 948 str.
...Ev. *712. STERRETT, J. While it is undoubtedly true that a plaintiff in ejectment must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of his adversary's, it is not always necessary for him to commence by proving title out of the commonwealth, and then to... | |
 | 1908 - 1282 str.
...defendants' land, we have In an ejectment action where the plaintiff should recover, If at all, on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of his adversary's title, a finding merely that the disputed strip did not belong to the defendants, without finding whether... | |
 | 1886 - 1058 str.
...them, the action could not be maintained. In such an action, the plaintiff must recover, if at all, upon the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant's title. It is an action to try the title and right to the possession of land. More accurately,... | |
 | 1920 - 1140 str.
...resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiffs, to reverse which defendant appeals. [1, 2] Since the plaintiff in ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title, and not because of any weakness in the title of his adversary, and plaintiffs failed to prove their asserted... | |
 | 1906 - 1264 str.
...legal or equitable title. It Is essential that "he have title and the relief must be obtained on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of his adversary." But this suggestion, of course, assumes the proposition that Is being discussed. The question... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 804 str.
...ever made a formal location of their claims. These instructions are in conflict with the principle that a plaintiff in ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title, and not upon the weakno«< of that of liis adversary. Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 800 str.
...trial. James B. Townsend, for Appellant. EougMon & Reynolds, and MG CoVb, for Respondents. The plaintiff must recover upon the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the title of the defendants; that being so, defendants can show title out of plaintiff and in a third... | |
| |
The rule that a plaintiff in ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title and not on the weakness of his adversary's... 
