 | John Marshall - 1903 - 828 str.
...the United States a preference in bankruptcy over other creditors 43 HEPBURN AND DONDAS v. ELLZEY: The District of Columbia is not a State within the meaning of the Constitution. 48 Ex PARTE BOLLMAN AND SWARTWOUT: The American law of treason 51 UNITED STATES v. AARON... | |
 | John Marshall - 1903 - 828 str.
...stated by Mr. Justice Curtis in his edition of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States: The District of Columbia is not " a State " within the meaning of that term as used in the Constitution, and its citizens cannot sue in the courts of the United States... | |
 | John Marshall - 1903 - 832 str.
...stated by Mr. Justice Curtis in his edition of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States : The District of Columbia is not " a State " within the meaning of that term as used in the Constitution, and its citizens cannot sue in the courts of the United States... | |
 | Thomas H. Calvert - 1907 - 408 str.
...even if so inclined." In the Hepburn v. Ellzey case, referred to by Judge McDowell, it was held that the, District of Columbia is not a " State " within the meaning of Article III, section 2, of the ConChapter APPLICATION OF COMMON LAW AND STATE STATUTORY f. RULES. There... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1910 - 1246 str.
...violation of copyright, equitable action being more effective. 2 Cr. 445-453, 2 L. 332, HEPBURN v. BLLZEY. The District of Columbia is not " a State " within the meaning of the term used In the Constitution and its citizens cannot sue In United States courts as citizens of any... | |
 | 1922 - 740 str.
...in this respect between the citizens of the District and those of the States, the fact remains that the District of Columbia is not a State within the meaning of the constitutional provision authorizing citizens of one State to sue and be sued by citizens of another... | |
 | 1882 - 578 str.
...of 3500. 1 Stat. 78; 18 Stat. 470. At an early day it was held in Hepburn v. Ell/ey, 2 Cr. 445, that the District of Columbia is not "a State" within the meaning of that term as used in the article of the Constitution defining the judicial power of the United States,... | |
 | Laurence Frederick Schmeckebier - 1928 - 1002 str.
...powers, with respect to the ownership, disposition, and inheritance of property.' On the other hand the District of Columbia is not a state within the meaning of Section 2 of Article III of the Constitution, which provides that the judicial power of the United... | |
 | United States. U.S. Congress. House. Committee on the judiciary - 1938 - 162 str.
...in this respect between the citizens of the District and those of the States, the fact remains that the District of Columbia is not a State within the meaning of the constitutional provision authorizing citizens of one State to sue and be sued by citizens of another... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on a Judiciary - 1941 - 332 str.
...sue in the Federal courts in cases "between citizens of different States" it was held in 1805 that the District of Columbia is not a State within the meaning of section 2 of article III of the Constitution (Hepburn and Dundas y. Ellzey, 2 Cranch 443). Public Act... | |
| |
States, the fact remains that the District of Columbia is not a State... 
