| Ohio. Superior Court (Montgomery County), Oscar M. Gottschall - 1900 - 520 str.
...that defendant has been compelled to pay the Beiser judgment. Section 93 of the code provides that the defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defense, counter-claim and set-off, as he may have, whether they be such as have heretofore been denominated... | |
| California, Carter Pitkin Pomeroy - 1901 - 668 str.
...information; 6. That the act or omission charged as the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended; 7. That the act or omission charged as the offense is... | |
| Idaho - 1901 - 620 str.
...indictment ; 6. That the act or omission charged as the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended ; •j. That the act or omission charged as the offense... | |
| Thomas B. Martin - 1901 - 660 str.
...the action is entitled to whatever relief the principles of law or equity would entitled him to; and the defendant 'may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defense, counterclaim and set-off, whether legal or equitable, as he shall have.' So justices of the... | |
| Indiana - 1901 - 1792 str.
...new matter constituting a defense, counterclaim, or set-off, in plain and concise language. Third. The defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defense, counter-claim, and set-off, whether legal or equitable, as he shall have. Each shall be distinctly... | |
| Oregon - 1902 - 1036 str.
...and within the time limited by law for the commencement of an action therefor ; tinctly set forth, in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended ; 7. That the act or omission charged as the crime is... | |
| Melvin Bolli Ogden - 1902 - 854 str.
...information. 6. That the act or omission charged as the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. 7. That the act or omission charged as the offense is... | |
| Kentucky - 1902 - 1282 str.
...accord and satisfaction. I Ch. PI., 541-42. And, <*I25 °f tne Code of 1854 having declared that a defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defence as he shall have, the Court of Appeals, following the English rule, held that a defendant in an action for slander might,... | |
| Washington (State). Supreme Court, Arthur Remington, Solon Dickerson Williams - 1904 - 826 str.
...indictment is sufficient if the act or omission charged as a crime is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. All of the requirements summed up are for the purpose,... | |
| 1904 - 1032 str.
..."complaint" is defined by the Code to be a statement of the facts constituting a cause of action, in plain and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. Travelers' 1ns. Co. v. Prairie School Тp., 51 NE 100,... | |
| |