 | Henry Kollock - 1822 - 544 str.
...many miracles. Numbers " believed in his name; but Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, and needed not that any should testify of man, for he knew what was in man." He knew that, notwithstanding their present belief and professions, the) would not continue attached... | |
 | William Jillard Hort - 1822 - 232 str.
...seeing the miracles which he did, believed in him. But Jesus did not commit himself to them, because he knew all men, and needed not that any should testify of man, for he knew what was in man. After these things, came Jesus and his disciples into the land of Judea, and there he tarried with... | |
 | Thomas Scott - 1822 - 512 str.
...repeatedly observe, " that he knew the thoughts of msn :" and the apostle John expressly says, that " he knew all men ; and needed not that any should testify of man, for he knew what was in man."l If it be possible for any man to doubt whether this be an undeniable ascription of omniscience... | |
 | 1841 - 1234 str.
...human metaphysics, but as illustrated by deep experience, and sketched by the pencil of One, who " needed not that any should testify of man, for he knew what was in man." (John ii. 25.) The divine bounty shines in that variety of endowments by which all the wants of this Connexion... | |
 | E. J. Burrow - 1822 - 606 str.
...that the judgment of God is according to truth against them which commit such things. John ii. 25. And needed not that any should testify of man ; for he knew what was in man. Rev. xx. 1 1 — 15- And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the heaven... | |
 | 1876 - 1204 str.
...? Were the fathers of her race all in darkness and in error ? Is Gerizim no sacred mount ? He who " needed not that any should testify of man ; for He knew what was in man," did not hesitate to commit to her His clearest teaching. Few perhaps in Jerusalem •would have listened... | |
 | Nathanael Emmons - 1823 - 508 str.
...name, when they saw the miracles which he did. But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, and needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man." He knew that those who professed to love and believe in him, were totally destitute of both love and... | |
 | Thom Scott - 1823 - 514 str.
...repeatedly observe, " that he knew " the thoughts of men :" and the apostle John expressly says, " that he knew all men ; and " needed not that any should testify of man, for " he knew what was in man1," If it be possible for any man to doubt whether this be an undeniable ascription of omniscience... | |
 | 1823 - 542 str.
...principal parts of the evangelical narrative. Everywhere we perceive, in living evidence, that " he needed not that any should testify of man, for he knew what was in man :" and it is remarkable, by the way, that, immediately after this general assertion, the Evangelist... | |
 | Samuel Stennett - 1823 - 342 str.
...authority, not as the Scribes. He had an exact and comprehensive1 knowledge of all men and of all things. He needed not that any should testify of man .- for he knew what was in man.* How devoutly should we revere his infinite wisdom and penetration ! How diligently listen to his instructions!... | |
| |
But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, and needed not that any should testify of man, for he knew what was in man. 
