 | Gerhard Loibl - 2002 - 472 str.
..."mother of all constitutional cases" in the US legal system, Chief Justice John Marshall declared: "The government of the United States has been emphatically...government of laws, and not of men. It will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation, if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a [...]... | |
 | Barry Latzer - 2002 - 366 str.
...judicial review under the Eighth Amendment meaningless." Solem v. Helm, 463 US 277, 303 (1983). "The government of the United States has been emphatically...government of laws, and not of men. It will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation, if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested... | |
 | Theodore L. Johnson - 2002 - 600 str.
...he receives an injury. One of the first duties of government is to afford that protection." 2. "The government of the United States has been emphatically...government of laws and not of men. It will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation, if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested... | |
 | Paul W. Kahn - 1997 - 324 str.
...Studying the Rule of Law I Marbury and the Historical Origins of the American Legal lmagination "The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men."1 So the Supreme Court declared in 1803, in one of the earliest and still the greatest of constitutional... | |
 | James F. Simon - 2003 - 356 str.
..."one of the first duties of government" was to afford its citizens the protection of the laws. "The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws and not of men," he wrote. "It will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation, if the laws furnish no remedy... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Resources - 2003 - 138 str.
...Chief Justice Marshall stated long ago in Marbury v. Madison, 5 US (1 Cranch) 137, 163 (1803), the "government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws not of men." Yet, if HR 5155 is enacted, groups of individual Native Americans would have the authority... | |
 | Jay Shafritz - 2004 - 319 str.
...Chief Justice John Marshall also used a succinct legal description in Marbury v. Madison (1803): "The government of the United States has been emphatically...government of laws, and not of men. It will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation, if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested... | |
 | H. L. Pohlman - 2004 - 340 str.
...a right and that right has been violated, do the laws of his country afford him a remedy? . . . The government of the United States has been emphatically...government of laws, and not of men. It will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation, if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested... | |
 | George D. Pozgar - 2004 - 584 str.
...wherein we see reflected not only our own lives but also the lives of those who went before us."1 "The government of the United States has been emphatically...government of laws, and not of men. It will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation, if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested... | |
 | Lars Trägårdh - 2004 - 181 str.
...great Federalist Chief Justice John Marshall. In Marbury v. Madison (1803), Marshall proclaimed that 'the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men'. The Constitution sets limits on government 'and that those limits may not be mistaken, or forgotten,... | |
| |
The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. It will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation, if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested legal right. 
