| Illinois. Appellate Court, Edwin Burritt Smith, Martin L. Newell - 1889 - 704 str.
...WATNE and SHERWOOD & JONES, for appellants. VOL. 27. | Gould v. Warne. condition of his undertaking. He has a right to stand upon the very terms of his contract. Miller v. Stewart. 9 Wheat. 680; Field v. Rawlings, 1 Gilm. 581. Any agreement between the jirincip.il... | |
| United States. Department of Justice - 1890 - 698 str.
...circumstances pointed out in his obligation he is bound, and no further. He has a right to stand on the very terms of his contract, and if he does not...variation of it and a variation is made, it is fatal. And courts of equity, as well as of law, have been in the constant habit of scanning the contracts... | |
| Abraham Clark Freeman - 1890 - 1000 str.
...CONTRACTS, 7. SURETYSHIP. L CONTRACT cat SURETYSHIP is ^O.NSTRUED STRICTLY in favor of th« surety. He has a right to stand upon the very terms of his contract; and any alteration therein made without his consent ii fatal to hi* obligation, whether he is injured thereby... | |
| 1891 - 936 str.
...his obligation, he is bound, and no farther. It is not sufficient that he may sustain no injury by a change in the contract, or that it may even be for his benoflt. He has a right to stand upon the very terms of his contract: and if he does not assent to... | |
| 1891 - 1150 str.
...may sustain no injury by a change in the contract, and that it may even be for his benefit He has the right to stand upon the very terms of his contract and if a variation is made it is fatal. Miller v. Stewart, 9 Wheat, 681. But it is said that the declarations... | |
| Abraham Clark Freeman - 1892 - 1022 str.
...obligation, he is bound, and no further. It is not sufficient that he may sustain no injury by a change of the contract, or that it may even be for his benefit....variation of it, and a variation is made, it is fatal. And courts of equity, as well as law, have been in the constant habit of scanning the contracts of... | |
| 1892 - 1148 str.
...further. It is nut sufficient that he may sustain no injury by a change in the contract, or that it may be for his benefit; he has a right to stand upon the very terms of his contract, and if he dues not assent to any variation of it, and a variation is made, it is iatjil.™ Milltr v. ¡Stewart.... | |
| Abraham Clark Freeman - 1892 - 1030 str.
...CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT or. — A contract of snretyship is construed strictly in favor of the surety. He has a right to stand upon the very terms of his contract! Andtrxm v. Belleitger, 87 Ala. 334; 13 Am. St. Rep. 46; Price v. Dime etc. Bank, 124 111. 317; 7 Am.... | |
| Illinois. Appellate Court, Edwin Burritt Smith, Martin L. Newell - 1892 - 698 str.
...Rcvill, 4 Ad. & Ell. 675; Kearsey v. Cole, 16 Mees. & W. 136; Webb v. Hewitt, 3 K. & J. 438. A surety has a right to stand upon the very terms of his contract; any alteration without his consent will extinguish his liability, even though it be for his benefit.... | |
| |