 Negligence is the absence of care according to the circumstances, and is always a question for the jury when there is a reasonable doubt as to the facts, or as to the inferences to be drawn from them. When the measure of duty is ordinary and reasonable...  American Law Reports Annotated - Strana 5661927Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | John Milton Gardner, Walter James Eagle - 1898 - 892 str.
...absence of care, according to the circumstances, and is always a question for the jury, when there is a reasonable doubt as to the facts, or as to the inferences to be drawn from them. When the facts are either admitted or established by undisputed testimony, it is the duty of the court... | |
 | 1888 - 548 str.
...the absence of care according to the circumstances, and is always a question for the jury when there is a reasonable doubt as to the facts, or as to the inferences to be drawn from them. When the measure of duty is ordinary and reasonable cure, and the degree of care varies according to... | |
 | 1914 - 1358 str.
...of duty, it is negligence in law. "Negligence is always a question for the jury, when there Is any doubt as to the facts or as to the inferences to be drawn from them" (Railroad v. Barnett, 59 Pa. 259, 98 Am. Dec. 346), but Is a question of law where no such doubt appears... | |
 | 1891 - 1132 str.
...maturity and capacity of the individual, and all the surrounding circumstances; and, if there is any doubt as to the facts, or as to the inferences to be drawn from them, the question cannot bedetermined as matter of law, but must be submitted to the jury- As was said in... | |
 | 1883 - 632 str.
...CG Reber), for defendants in error. Negligence is always a question for the jury where there is any doubt as to the facts or as to the inferences to be drawn from them. Reeves v. D., L. & WRR Co., 6 Casey, 454. PRR v. Lewis, 29 Smith, 33. Hagan v. The Railroad, 5 Philada.... | |
 | 1926 - 1044 str.
...maturity and capacity of the individual, and all the surrounding circumstances; and if there is any doubt as to the facts, or as to the inferences to be drawn from them, the question can not be determined as matter of law, but must be submitted to the jury." (Italics are... | |
 | 1894 - 506 str.
...favorable as it was entitled to. "Negligence is always a question for the jury, where there are any doubts as to the facts, or as to the inferences to be drawn from them :" Railroad Co. v. Burnett, 59 Pa. 264; McOill v. Railway Co., 152 Id. 333; Whitman v. Railroad Co.,... | |
 | 1921 - 1852 str.
...and listening. — Clark v. St. Louis & SF It. Co., 108 P. 301, 24 Okl. 704. (Okl.1914) Where there is a reasonable doubt as to the facts or as to the inferences deducible therefrom, negligence is a question for the jury. —Hock Island Coal Mining Co. v. Davis,... | |
| |
