 | 1919 - 1812 str.
...controlled by what acts may be done under its authority. In the case of Ulman v. Baltimore, 72 Md. 587, 11 LRA 224, 20 Atl. 141, the court said: "It matters...be applied to ordinances. Hagerstown v. Baltimore & 0. R. Co. 107 Md. 178, 126 Am. St. Rep. 382, 68 Atl. 490 ; Curtis v. Mactier, 115 Md. 386, 80 Atl.... | |
 | William Mark McKinney, Burdett Alberto Rich - 1919 - 1600 str.
...is in contravention of the constitution, and lacks the essential element of "due process of law." 19 It matters not, upon the question of the constitutionality...fairly apportioned. The constitutional validity of the law is to be tested, not by what has been done under it, but by what may, by its authority, be... | |
 | New York (State) - 1920 - 784 str.
...act is important. As stated by Judge Earl in the case of Stuart v. Palmer, 74 NY 183, at page 188: " The constitutional validity of law is to be tested,...under it, but by what may, by its authority, be done." The act should be carefully scrutinized and construed to determine whether the Legislature acted within... | |
 | Harry Bower Bradbury - 1920 - 666 str.
...constitutionality of such law, that the questions involved have been- fairly decided. The essential validity of the law is to be tested, not by what has been done under it, but by what may by its authority be done. Stuart v. Palmer, 74 NY 183, 188 (30 Am. Rep. 289); Oilman v. Tucker, 128 NY 190, 200 (28 NE 1040,... | |
 | Colorado. Supreme Court - 1920 - 680 str.
...valuable animals, it is confiscatory ; that the constitutionality of the statute is to be determined not by what has been done under it, but by what may be done ; and since one dollar per head might be charged for fowls not worth that sum, the whole ordinance... | |
 | New York (State). Legislature - 1921 - 1126 str.
...important. As stated by Mr. Justice Earle m the case of Stuart v. Palmer, 74 NY 183, at page 188 : " The constitutional validity of law is to be tested, not by what has been done under it, but what may, fey its authority, be done." The act should be carefully scrutinized and construed to determine... | |
 | Nebraska. Supreme Court, David Allen Campbell, Guy Ashton Brown, Lorenzo Crounse, Walter Alber Leese, Lee Herdmen, Henry Clay Lindsay, Henry Paxon Stoddart - 1922 - 980 str.
...them the Albin v. Consolidated School District. right to a hearing and an opportunity to be heard. Ii matters not, upon the question of the constitutionality...fairly apportioned. The constitutional validity of the law is to be tested, not by what has been done under it. but by what, n>ay, by its authority, be... | |
 | 1922 - 1120 str.
...law must require notice to them, and give them the right to a hearing and an opportunity to be hoard. It matters not, upon the question of the constitutionality of such a law, that the assessment lias, in fact, been fairly apportioned. The constitutional validity of the law is to be tested, not... | |
 | New York (State). Legislature - 1923 - 414 str.
...under like circumstances. It seems that this provision must be invalid. " The constitutionality of a law is to be tested, not by what has been done under it, but what may by its authority, be done." (Stuart v. Palmer, 74 NY, 183 at page 188.) But if valid as to... | |
 | Virginia. Bureau of Labor and Industrial Statistics - 1909 - 312 str.
...law and of construction as are applicable thereto. The validity of the contract should be determined not by what has been done under it, but by what may be done under it, by what will be its real tendency with reference to trade and monopoly when in full... | |
| |
The constitutional validity of law is to be tested, not by what has been done under it, but by what may, by its authority, be done. 
