 | 1983 - 858 str.
[ Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný. ] | |
 | 1962 - 1506 str.
[ Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný. ] | |
 | 1937 - 1052 str.
[ Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný. ] | |
 | 1929 - 1096 str.
[ Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný. ] | |
 | 1926 - 508 str.
...dunnaging adopted was faulty and negligent, the existence of a custom so to do was not a good excuse. What ought to be done is fixed by a standard of reasonable...prudence, whether it is usually complied with or not.' "Nor may it be said that the usage became by implication a term of the contract of carriage so as to... | |
 | 1923 - 520 str.
...customary on vessels engaged in the Brazilian coffee trade. "What ought to be done," said the court, "is fixed by a standard of reasonable prudence, whether it is usually complied with or not." In holding that the coffee was damaged as a result of a negligent failure to properly stow and protect... | |
 | 1975 - 1094 str.
[ Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný. ] | |
 | 1965 - 1476 str.
[ Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný. ] | |
 | 1908 - 1052 str.
...circumstances. This exception needs no discussion. The charge embodied one of the commonplaces of the law. What usually is done may be evidence of what ought...fixed by a standard of reasonable prudence, whether it usually is compiled with or not." And in the recent case of Shandrew v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul... | |
 | 1905 - 1052 str.
...same circumstances''' — the test of liability was right, and then, apparently casually, said that "what ought to be done is fixed by a standard of reasonable prudence, whether it usually is complied with or not," and cited Wabash R. Co. v. McDaniels. With this single exception,... | |
| |
What usually is done may be evidence of what ought to be done, but what ought to be done is fixed by a standard of reasonable prudence, whether it usually is complied with or not. 
