 It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence or an act not amounting to wanton wrong is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the...  American Law Reports Annotated - Strana 4811919Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | 1893 - 1172 str.
...the Injury It must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that It ought to have been foreseen In the light of the attending circumstances. Railway Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 475. The question, therefore, whether the stretching of the defendant's... | |
 | Vermont. Supreme Court - 1893 - 812 str.
...natural and probable sequence of the negligence or the wrongful act, and that it was such as might, or ought to, have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. But this rule is no test in cases where no intervening efficient cause is found between the original... | |
 | Austin Abbott - 1894 - 626 str.
...amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence...foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances." The court further say: " We do not say that even the natural and probable consequences of a wrongful... | |
 | William Francis Bailey - 1894 - 674 str.
...amounting to wanton wrong is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence...foreseen, in the light of the attending circumstances. We do not say that even the natural and probable consequences of a wrongful act or omission are in... | |
 | Oregon. Supreme Court, William Wallace Thayer, Joseph Gardner Wilson, Thomas Benton Odeneal, Julius Augustus Stratton, William Henry Holmes, Reuben S. Strahan, George Henry Burnett, Robert Graves Morrow, James W. Crawford, Frank A. Turner, Bellinger, Charles Byron - 1894 - 704 str.
...injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. Railway Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 475. The question, therefore, whether the stretching of the defendant's... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1894 - 1070 str.
...natural. and probable sequence of the negligence or the wrongful act, iw and that it was such as might, or ought to, have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. But this rule la no test in cases where no intervening efficient cause is found between the original... | |
 | 1897 - 830 str.
...amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of the injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence...foreseen, in the light of the attending circumstances." In Hoagf. Railroad Co., 85 Pa. St. 293, 298, 299, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania said : "The true... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1895 - 776 str.
...amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of the injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence...foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances." He states further: "We do not say that even the natural and probable consequences of a wrongful act... | |
| |
