It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence or an act not amounting to wanton wrong is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the... American Law Reports Annotated - Strana 4811919Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
| Abraham Clark Freeman - 1897 - 1056 str.
...amounting to wanton wrong is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence...it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the 58 attending circumstances." In this quotation is to be found the principle upon which this case should... | |
| Norman Fetter - 1897 - 888 str.
...an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligent or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of attending circumstances." T In New Jersey the rule is as follows: "It is not nec« Henry v. Railroad... | |
| Abraham Clark Freeman - 1897 - 1044 str.
...Injury, It must appear that the Injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligent and wrongful act, and that It ought to have been foreseen In the light of attending circumstances: Wood v. Pennsylvania RR Co., 177 Pa. St. 30G; 55 Am. St. Rep. 728, and note.... | |
| 1893 - 1282 str.
...finding that negligence is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence...and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light <>f the attending circumstances." The definition given by the court in its charge is perhaps subject... | |
| 1895 - 884 str.
...amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence...foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances." CHICAGO, ST. PAUL &c. R'Y CO. v. ELLIOTT. 387 Opinion of the Court. In Jloag v. Lake Shore and Michigan... | |
| 1900 - 908 str.
...must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or \vrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances." Judge Sanborn, speaking for the Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Railway Co. v. Elliott, 55... | |
| Thomas Johnson Michie - 1900 - 814 str.
...received was not the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful act of the defendant, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of attend ing circumstances ; that it means that the injury which the plaintiff received was the natural... | |
| John Milton Gardner, Walter James Eagle - 1900 - 848 str.
...and probable consequence of the negligence charged to appellant, and was his injury such as might or ought to have been foreseen, in the light of the attending circumstances? In the case of Davis v. Williams, 4 Ind. App. 487, 31 NE Rep. 204, the court said: " It is not every... | |
| |