 | 1893 - 1164 str.
...partners as the Franklin Bluestone Company, on the confession of George W. Franklin. Morris obtained a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened or stricken off, as to himself and the firm, and from an order discharging the rule he appeals. Reversed.... | |
 | 1889 - 1132 str.
...July, 1886, and a fl. fa., was issued thereon same day. August 20th of the same year this court granted a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and defendant let in to a defense. A voluminous amount of testimony was taken both for and against... | |
 | George Brubaker Kulp, Joseph D. Coons, Wesley E. Woodruff - 1886 - 576 str.
...was done until March 6, 1882, when an alias execution was issued. . Thereupon Hendrick applied for a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened, which was made absolute, and the parties agreed upon an issue for trial to be formed by the judgment... | |
 | 1894 - 1150 str.
...Freernann, John F. Keator, and RO Moon, for appellant. Carrie B. Kilgore, for appellee. McCOLLUM, J. A rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened was granted on an affidavit which, under a wellsettled rule of practice, would have been held insufficient... | |
 | 1891 - 1132 str.
...and that judgment was taken against him by default; that other counsel, on January 13, 1888, obtained a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened; that this rule was abandoned, and he then employed his present counsel; and that the sheriff of Camden... | |
 | 1917 - 1170 str.
...secured by a mortgage on lands. When the defendant discovered this, he applied for, and was allowed, a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and set aside, because the notice required to be filed, by an act entitled "Supplement to an act entitled... | |
 | 1895 - 1172 str.
...In question be stricken from the record, the proceeding appears to have been treated throughout as a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened, and defendant let Into a defense, etc. The result of our examination of the record, including the petition,... | |
 | 1899 - 1158 str.
...Sweeney In favor of the three executors, and execution was Issued. Upon July 29, 1898, defendant obtained a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened, alleging that she had been overreached In the matter of the sale. She also seeks to have the judgment... | |
 | 1887 - 1098 str.
...to pay the note within six years before the entering of judgment. On this petition the court granted a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened, but subsequently discharged it. The appellee, the payee of the note, filed an answer saving that the... | |
 | Pennsylvania. Supreme Court - 1891 - 858 str.
...why judgment should not be marked satisfied, which was subsequently discharged. On March 28, 1887, a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened was granted, which was subsequently made absolute, and an issue framed to determine whether the note... | |
| |
August 20th of same year, this court granted a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and defendant let into a defense. 
