 | Missouri. Supreme Court - 1913 - 896 str.
...could not prove motion by reasoning. If a thing moves (he is said to- have said) it must either move in the place where it is, or in the place where it is not. But it cannot move where it is, nor can it move where it is not. Therefore it cannot move. Appellants'... | |
 | D. B. McLachlan - 1892 - 260 str.
...fallacy of accident : he who eats least does not at the same time eat most. ' Whatever body is in motion must move either in the place where it is, or in the place where it is not ; neither of these is possible ; therefore there is no such thing as motion.' — It is an abuse of... | |
 | 1895 - 652 str.
...familiar instance is furnished by the argument to prove the impossibility of motion : "A body must move in the place where it is, or in the place where it is not. But both of these are impossible, and there are no other places than these two. Hence motion is impossible."... | |
 | James Edwin Creighton - 1898 - 418 str.
...between parts that are inseparable, which therefore must be at perpetual rest one amongst another. 47. If a body moves, it must move either in the place where it is, or in the place where it is not. But a body cannot move in the place where it is, nor yet in the place where it is not. Hence a body cannot... | |
 | Karl Marquard Sauer - 1903 - 112 str.
...(existed) no (such thing as) movement, with the following argument: if a body moves, either it moves in the place where it is, or in the place where it is not (situated). In the place where it is, it does not move, for, in the time (so long as) it is there,... | |
 | Thomas Hobbes, Mary Whiton Calkins - 1905 - 232 str.
...the not understanding of this last proposition. For they say, that, if any body be moved, it is moved either in the place where it is, or in the place where it is not; both which are false; and therefore nothing is moved. But the falsity lies in the major proposition... | |
 | Horace William Brindley Joseph - 1906 - 598 str.
...reply to Zeno's dilemma to show the impossibility of motion, it is often said that a body need not move either in the place where it is or in the place where it is not; since it may move between these places. It may be questioned whether this is a very satisfactory solution... | |
 | James Edwin Creighton - 1909 - 548 str.
...of Zeno to show that it is against reason to believe that motion really takes place: — If a thing moves, it must move either in the place where it is or in the place where it is not, But it cannot move where it is, nor can it move where it is not, Therefore it cannot move. It is worth... | |
 | Boyd Henry Bode - 1910 - 348 str.
...flint; therefore a property cannot be separated from its subject. (Wilson.) 3. In order to move, a body must move either in the place where it is, or in the place where it is not. But it cannot move in the place where it is, since that place is already occupied. Neither can it move... | |
 | Delphian Society - 1911 - 566 str.
...For example, he used to confront his opponents with something like this: An arrow must either move in the place where it is or in the place where it isn't. If it moves in the place where it is, it is not in the place; if it moves in the place where... | |
| |
If a body moves, it must move either in the place where it is or in the place where it is not : but either of these is impossible : therefore it cannot move. 
