 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Rules and Administration - 1952 - 1504 str.
...v. T'niterl States. 320 r. S. 81. 100 (1943). wherein the Court recognized that, as a general rule. "Distinctions between citizens solely because of their...institutions are founded upon the doctrine of equality.") M.irupver. the instant statute deals with the right of citizens to vote, and it could easily be regarded... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Rules and Administration - 1952 - 216 str.
...Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 US 81, 100 (1943), wherein the Court recognized that, as a general rule, "Distinctions between citizens solely because of their...institutions are founded upon the doctrine of equality.") Moreover, the instant statute deals with the right of citizens to vote, and it could easily be regarded... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1954 - 942 str.
...Takahashi v. Fish & Game Commission, 334 US 410. Cf. Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 US 81, 100: "Distinctions between citizens solely because of their...institutions are founded upon the doctrine of equality." 8 Sanchez v. State, 147 Tex. Cr. R. 436, 181 SW 2d 87; Salazar v. State, 149 Tex. Cr. R. 260, 193 SW... | |
 | H. Lauterpacht - 1955 - 640 str.
...restrictions against citizens of Japanese descent. But the Court recognized that, as a general rule, ' Distinctions between citizens solely because of their...institutions are founded upon the doctrine of equality '. 32o US 81, 1oo (1943). " The only justification urged upon us by the State is that the discrimination... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1957 - 1322 str.
...Hirabayashi v. United States (320 US 81, 100 (1943)), wherein the Court recognized that, as a general rule, "Distinctions between citizens solely because of their...institutions are founded upon the doctrine of equality." Moreover, the instant statute deals with the right of citizens to vote, and it could easily be regarded... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1957 - 956 str.
...that discrimination in voting based on religion or national origin is arbitrary, unreasonable, and "by their very nature odious to a free people whose institutions are founded on the doctrine of equality." The proposed hill further strengthens the existing civil-rights statutes... | |
 | United States Commission on Civil Rights - 1962 - 336 str.
...Supreme Court said in Hirdbauashi v. United States,29 "Distinctions between citizens solely on the basis of their ancestry are by their very nature odious...institutions are founded upon the doctrine of equality." This view of Brown v. Board of Education is supported by the Supreme Court's subsequent decisions outlawing... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1964 - 948 str.
...Constitution, distinctions by law between citizens because of their race, ancestry, color or religion "are by their very nature odious to a free people...institutions are founded upon the doctrine of equality." Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 US 81, 100. Given this settled principle that statesanctioned racial... | |
| |
Distinctions between citizens solely because of their ancestry are by their very nature odious to a free people whose institutions are founded upon the doctrine of equality. 
