...Executives' Assn. as amicus curiae urging reversal. 164 Opinion of the Court. MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. The question in this case is whether a State may make the defense of contributory negligence available to a railroad sued by a nonemployee...

...(1969) ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO REVERSED JANUARY 20, 1969 Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court. The question in this case is whether the city of Akron, Ohio, has denied its Negro citizen, Nellie Hunter, the equal protection of its laws...

...Attorney General Wilton, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Marshall Tamor Golding. MB. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court. The question in this case is whether Title II of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, 82 Stat. 159, 18 USC §891 et teq. (1964 ed., Supp....

...as amici curiae, by special leave of court. OPINION OF THE COURT MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER delivered the opinion of the Court. The question in this case is whether mandamus is an appropriate means of challenging the validity of an indictment of a Member of Congress...

...threshold contention that an Ohio statute mooted the case. Vote: 8-1. * * * MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court. The question in this case is whether the City of Akron, Ohio, has denied a Negro citizen, Nellie Hunter, the equal protection of its laws...

...Washington, and Charles B. Roe, Jr., Senior 182 255 Opinion of the Court MR. JUSTICE POWELL delivered the opinion of the Court. The question in this case is whether municipal zoning ordinances took .appellants' property without just compensation in violation of the...

...General of the State of New York, as amicus curiae, urging affirmance. MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. The question in this case is whether appellant, publisher of Life Magazine, was denied constitutional protections of speech and press by...

...conviction and sentence wholly void." Brown v. Mississippi, 297 US 278 Mr. Chief Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the Court. The question in this case is whether convictions which rest solely upon confessions shown to have been extorted by officers of the State...

...judgments must be reversed. . . . BROWN v. MISSISSIPPI, 297 US 278 (1936) Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court. The question in this case is whether convictions, which rest solely upon confessions shown to have been extorted by officers of the State...

...Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 US 357, 98 S. Ct. 663, 54 L. Ed. 2d 604 (1978) Mr. Justice Stewart delivered the opinion of the Court. The question in this case is whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is violated when a state prosecutor carries out...