 | 1879 - 540 str.
...such mattcrsat all. The act of 1867 is invalid, as the constitution, art. 4, § 20, prescribes that "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in Its title;" the statute of 1865 is expressly confined by its title to " literary and scientific purposes." Our... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1875 - 674 str.
...unconstitutional and void, because in violation of section 20 of article 4 of the constitution, which provides, 'no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title.' The history and purpose of this constitutional provision are too well understood to require any elucidation... | |
 | Virginia. General Assembly - 1876 - 88 str.
...religious instructor, and to make for his support such private contract as he shall please. SEC. 15. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title , nor shall any law be revived or amended with reference to its title, but the act revived or the section... | |
 | Michigan - 1877 - 644 str.
...legislature of 1872ns conflicting with the llrst clause of section 20, Article IV. of the constitution, which says: "No law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in its title." xpresscd r, repealed. 17 SUBJECT. Сотр. I. .IV.-, Sections and Clmpt'ra Am'ded or Repealed. GENERAL... | |
 | Michigan - 1877 - 764 str.
...etc., is in conflict with Sec. 20, Art. four of the Constitution of the State, which provides that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. It was contended by the plaintiff in error that the title of the act was not broad enough to cover... | |
 | 1887 - 2090 str.
...capital stock of said railroad, is not repugnant to the article in the state constitution providing that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in the title. 2. TAXATION— CONSTITUTIONAL RULES — AID то RAILROAD. An act to submit the question... | |
 | Michigan Pharmaceutical Association - 1883 - 852 str.
...opinion was based on the fact that Sec. 20 of Article IV. of the constitution of the state provides that "No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." The adulteration section was however reinstated in the Senate by an enemy of the bill, who probably... | |
 | 1902 - 988 str.
...companies would violate the state Constitution, § 20 of art. 4, which provides that "no law ehall t inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States, by reason The title of the street railway act is "An Act to Provide for the Formation of Street Railways," and... | |
 | Charles Henry Winston, Thomas Randolph Price, D. Lee Powell, John Meredith Strother, H. H. Harris, John P. McGuire, Rodes Massie, William Fayette Fox, Harry Fishburne Estill (F.), Richard Ratcliffe Farr, John Lee Buchanan, George R. Pace - 1884 - 1242 str.
...his religious instructor, and to make for his support such private contract as he i please. SEC. 15. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed ii its title, nor shall any law be revived or amended with reference to its title, but tit act revived,... | |
| |
No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title... 
