 | 1885 - 256 str.
...of its passage. The constitution of the State of Michigan, sect. 20 of Art. IV., provides that ' ' no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." In view of the possible danger that the courts might construe " the practice of pharmacy," " the sale... | |
 | Norfolk (Va.). - 1885 - 256 str.
...from its passage. Commenoem't Extracts from the Constitution of the Commonwealth. ARTICLE V. Sec. 15. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title ; nor shall any law be revived or amended with reference to its title, but the act revived or the section... | |
 | 1887 - 892 str.
...inconsistent with provisions remaining nnrepealed, it ia a violation of the constitutional provision, that "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title ": Stewart v. Father Mathrw Soc., 41 Midi. 67. 10. Miscellaneous. — The constitutional provision... | |
 | Michigan. Legislature. Senate - 1887 - 1304 str.
...constitution heretofore quoted, but also with sec. 20 of act 4 of the constitution which declares that " No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." Independent of the constitution and tiie statutes, your committee would not deem it wise to require... | |
 | Virginia. General Assembly - 1887 - 108 str.
...instructor, and to make for his support such private contract as he shall please. SEC. 15. No laws shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title, nor shall any law be revived or amended with reference to its title, but the act revived, or the section... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1889 - 738 str.
...§ 2, is in violation of article 4, section 16 of the constitution, which is in these words : " Xo law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title; nor shall any law be revived or amended by reference to its title ; but the act revived or amended... | |
 | 1889 - 954 str.
...act as a judge of the chancery court, is not repugnant to Const. Va. art. 5, 8 15, providing 'jhat "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its «tie." Appeal from chancery court of city of Bichmond. Bill of review filed by Chapman W. Morriss.... | |
 | 1890 - 950 str.
...purposes indicated in the title to the Act amended. Section 20, art. 4. of the Constitution provides that "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." This attempt to incorporate a new business into the Act of 1875 by the Amendment of 1881 falls plainly... | |
 | West Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1891 - 858 str.
...15, 1867, is claimed to be in conflict with that provision of the constitution which declares that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. Before the court will declare the act invalid, as opposed to the constitution, the rcpug- Au,,usst7Term.... | |
 | 1891 - 128 str.
...final passage of all bills, the vote shall be by yeas and nays, and entered on the journal. SEC. 20. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. No public act shall take effect or be in force until the expiration of ninety days from the end of... | |
| |
No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title... 
