 | Scott J. Hammond, Kevin R. Hardwick, Howard Leslie Lubert - 2007 - 1193 str.
...reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal. SEC. res. But it could not be a less folly to abolish publicservices; which, not being descendible, neither ought the offices of magistrate, legislator,... | |
 | Michael Farris - 2007 - 491 str.
...the Rights and the Privileges of religious Society. [Article IV of the Declaration of Rights says,] "No Man or set of men are entitled to exclusive or...Community but in consideration of public Services." If, therefore, the State provides a Support for Preachers of the Gospel, and they receive it in Consideration... | |
 | John Massaro - 2008 - 704 str.
...arbitrary power and oppression is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind. 3. That no man, or set of men, are entitled to exclusive or separate public emoluments or privileges from the community, but in consideration of public services, which,... | |
 | Erik S. Root - 2008 - 255 str.
...indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter or abolish the Government That no man nor set of men, are entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges, but in consideration of public services. That all men, having sufficient evidence of permanent common... | |
| |
That no man, or set of men, are entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges from the community, but in consideration of public services; which, not being descendible, neither ought the offices of magistrate, legislator, or judge to be hereditary. 
