| 1894 - 1036 str.
...been exercised uniformly over territory in possession of the Indians. The existence of this power must negative the existence of any right which may conflict with and control It" The land in controversy having never, prior to its settlement in 1846, and, as we shall see, never... | |
| 1927 - 620 str.
...been exercised uniformly over territory in possession of the Indians. The existence of this power must negative the existence of any right which may conflict...others not compatible with it. All our institutions recognize the absolute title of the crown, subject only to the Indian right of occupancy, and recognize... | |
| Julius Irizarry Puente - 1928 - 332 str.
...v. Chamberlain, 12 Wheat. 599, 6 L. ed. 741; Foster v. Neilson, 2 Pet. 309, 7 L. ed. 415. Cession. An absolute title to lands cannot exist, at the same...which excludes all others not compatible with it." Territory is frequently transferred from one sovereignty to another by means of a treaty of cession,... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs - 1948 - 618 str.
...equality with non-Indians. The power of the United States to extinguish Indian rights of occupancy "must negative the existence of any right which may conflict with and control it" (Jolinnon v. Mclntosh, 21 US 523 (1823) ). And it is clear that whether and to what extent Indian rights... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs - 1950 - 576 str.
...equality with non-Indians. The power of the United States to extinguish Indian rights of occupancy "must negative the existence of any right which may conflict with and control it" (Johnson v. Mclntosn, 21 US 523 (1823) ). And it is clear that whether and to what extent Indian rights... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs - 1950 - 590 str.
...equality with non-Indians. The power of the United States to extinguish Indian rights of occupancy "must negative the existence of any right which may conflict with and control it" (Johnxon v. Mclntosh, 21 TJ. S. 523 (1823) ). And it is clear that whether and i to what extent Indian... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries - 1978 - 352 str.
...been exercised uniformly over territory in possession of the Indians. The existence of this power must negative the existence of any right which may conflict...others not compatible with it. All our institutions recognize the absolute title of the crown, subject only to the Indian right of occupancy, and recognize... | |
| |