 | Samuel Maxwell - 1892 - 932 str.
...only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it was given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public." The leading case is Mitchel v. Reynolds, I P. \Vrns. 181, I Smith's LC (6 Ed.) 641, to which the reader... | |
 | 1903 - 880 str.
...only as to afford a fair protection to the Interests of the party In favor of whom it Is Riven, and not so large as to Interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to cither.... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, Edwin Burritt Smith, Martin L. Newell - 1892 - 712 str.
...as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the parties in favor of whom it is given, and is not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. As the Supreme Court of this State say, in the case of Kraft et al. v. McConoughy, "Whatever is injurious... | |
 | Charles Andrew Ray - 1892 - 580 str.
...only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in whose favor it is given ; and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public.' A covenant in restraint of trade which is unlimited in regard to space, except by the words " so far... | |
 | New Jersey. Bureau of Industrial Statistics - 1893 - 524 str.
...Von Fleet, VC, May Term, 188L afford a fair protection to the party in favor of whom it is given and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. This isthe principle which controlled the decision in Mandeville v. Harman, 15 Stew. Eq. 185. The contract... | |
 | Ernest Wilson Huffcut, Edwin Hamlin Woodruff - 1894 - 762 str.
...only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public." When the restraint is general, but at the same time is coextensive only with the interest to be protected,... | |
 | John Lewis - 1895 - 826 str.
...such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in whose favor it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. 3. REASONABLENESS A QUESTION OF LAW. Whether a restraint is reasonable in any given case is a question,... | |
 | 1916 - 412 str.
...only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public.' (Homer r. Graves, 7 Bing. 735.) " Under and as a result of these decisions, in England, restraints... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1896 - 1512 str.
...such only as to afford a tailprotection to the interest of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public." LORD HERSCHELL, LC, said further: " Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the... | |
| |
And we do not see how a better test can be applied to the question whether reasonable or not, than by considering whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so... 
