 | Curtis Holbrook Lindley - 1903 - 1100 str.
...and their banks as far as highwater mark belong to the state, and not to the federal government. They were not granted by the constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the statec respectively, and the new states have the same rights o^ sovereignty and jurisdiction with regard... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1905 - 1008 str.
...Alabama over them as the original states possess over navigable waters within their respective limits. The shores of navigable waters, and the soils under...States, but were reserved to the states respectively; and the new states have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this subject as the original... | |
 | United States. Army. Office of the Judge Advocate General - 1907 - 484 str.
...shores of navigable waters and the soil under them. — The shores of navigable waters and the soil under them were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but reserved to the States respectively. And the new States have the same rights as the original States.... | |
 | United States. Army. Judge Advocate General's Department. War Department - 1907 - 484 str.
...shores of navigable waters and the soil under them. — The shores of navigable waters and the soil under them were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but reserved to the States respectively. And the new States have the same rights as the original States/... | |
 | Colorado Scientific Society - 1908 - 418 str.
...further from the syllabus of the leading case of Pollard's Lessee vs. Hagan (3 Howard, 212), supra: "The shores of navigable waters and the soils under...States, but were reserved to the states respectively; and the new states have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this subject as the original... | |
 | U.S. Army Engineer School - 1908 - 156 str.
...to all their navigable waters and the soil under them. The shores of navigable waters and the soil under them were not granted by the Constitution to...States, but were reserved to the States respectively. And new States have the same rights of sovereignty and jurisdiction over this subject as the original... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1908 - 172 str.
...concludes as follows : By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at these general conclusions: First, the shores of navigable waters and the soils under them were not granted by thp Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the States, respectively. Second, the new... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Public Lands - 1910 - 106 str.
...Alabama over them as the original States possess over navigable waters within their respective limits. The shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution of the United States, but were reserved to the States respectively ; and the new States have the same... | |
 | Washington State Bar Association - 1911 - 1472 str.
...In Pollard's Lessee v. Hagan, 3 Howard, p. 230, the following fundamental principles were announced: "First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils...sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this subject as the original states." In McCready v. Virginia, 94 US pp. 394-5, it is said: "The principle has long... | |
 | New York (State) Commissioners of the State Reservation at Niagara - 1911 - 962 str.
...between the several States and foreign nations. In Pollard v. Ilogan, 3 How. 212, it was held that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under them were not granted by the Constitution of the United States, but were reserved to the States respectively. That was an Alabama case, and the... | |
| |
By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at these general conclusions. : First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the States respectively.... 
