 | United States Commission on Civil Rights - 1972 - 88 str.
...Gulf. Colorado and Santa Fé Ry. v. Kills. the Court said that legislative classifications must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis.11 The Court also has emphasized that... | |
 | Howard A. Glickstein, William L. Want, United States Commission on Civil Rights - 1972 - 172 str.
...Ry. v. Ellis, the Court said that legislative classifications must always rest upon some differences which bears a reasonable and just relation to the...in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis. 71/ 71/ Gulf, Colorado and Santa F£... | |
 | Jerome G. Rose - 1973 - 300 str.
...is administered? The Supreme Court has generally held that: the attempted classification must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...in respect to which the classification is proposed. and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis.7The reasonableness of any classification... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance. Subcommittee on Health - 1976 - 620 str.
...reimbursement for their services. According to the Supreme Court, such a classification "must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis." Gulf C. & SFR Co. v. Ellis, 165 US 150,... | |
 | South Dakota. Supreme Court - 1911 - 720 str.
...upon proper foundation and result in substantial uniformity and equality. Classification "must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis. * * * But arbitrary selection can never... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance. Subcommittee on Health - 1976 - 624 str.
...According to the Supreme Court, such a classification "must always rest upon some difference which bears n reasonable and just relation to the Act in respect to which the classification Is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis." Qulf C. & SFR Co. v. Ellis, 165 US 150,... | |
 | South Dakota. Supreme Court - 1918 - 804 str.
...liabilities imposed, the test being whether or not the classification rests upon some difference bearing a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect to which the classification is 25 — Vol. 39, SD proposed, though it need not always depend on scientific or marked distinctions... | |
 | Idaho. Supreme Court - 1904 - 896 str.
...distinctions which do not furnish any proper basis for the attempted classification. That must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...to the act in respect to which the classification ie proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily, and without such basis. No duty rests more impressively... | |
 | 1906 - 1266 str.
...In discussing the propriety of discrimination In legislation: "That [classification for legislation] must rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...In respect to which the classification Is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis." There can be no doubt that the business... | |
 | 1922 - 1204 str.
...marked out by them. "It is settled law that a classification for legislative purposes 'must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis,' » » * and, also, that the distinction... | |
| |
That must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis. 
